March of the Titans

[Stefanus]

March of the Titans
A History Of The White Race

Chapter 63: The Shadow of the Ghetto - The Saga of the European Jews

The Second World War was marked by the greatest anti-Jewish outburst in history: so much has been made of the persecution of the Jews under Adolf Hitler, that it has often assumed even greater emphasis than the actual war itself.

Anti-Semitism - or, more accurately, anti-Jewishness - was however, not an invention of Hitler nor of his National Socialist German Workers' Party (two sets of letters of the German translation of this party name, National Sozialist - were combined to make the word Nazi.) Anti-Jewish sentiment has always stalked the Jews, where-ever they went: it seems as if their very presence always elicited a negative and hostile response from virtually all the nations in which they settled.

While conventional histories all maintain that it was the rise of Christianity which started anti-Jewish feeling (the Jews are accused in the Christian bible of being responsible for Jesus Christ's death), this interpretation is factually incorrect. In reality, anti-Jewish sentiment existed long before Christianity, and the introduction of that religion and its distortions merely provided another means of expression for the latent anti-Jewish feeling which always followed the Jews like a shadow.


Origins of Anti-Jewish Sentiment

The origins of this original anti-Jewish feeling lie within the nature of Jewish society itself: exclusively ethno-centric with a binding religion and inward looking culture, the Jews always managed to maintain themselves as an isolated community in all of the nations in which they settled. This tradition has maintained itself to this day.

The nature of the Jewish God, as revealed in the Christian bible (the God is the same one as in the Jewish Talmud, making a mockery of Christian anti-Jewishness) as a God who has chosen a specific people to the exclusion of all others, has already been discussed in the chapter dealing with Christianity: suffice to say here that this cultural phenomena (aptly summed up by the well known rhyme "How odd of God to choose the Jews; It's not so odd, the Jews chose God") served to cement this isolationist feeling.

For this reason, Jews tended to live together in tightly knit communities in cities: these Jewish blocks came to be called ghettoes, and it is important to realize that the first ghettoes were entirely voluntary Jewish neighborhoods.

This was then re-inforced by religious laws limiting membership of the Jewish community by race - only people born of Jewish women could be accepted as Jews. This is another practice which has survived to the present day - people of no direct Jewish ancestry can only become Jews with great difficulty, and even them a large section of the Jewish community, the orthodox Jews, will not recognize converts as true Jews.

Finally, the well known Jewish propensity for business and the ability to accumulate vast amounts of money - a phenomena well known to this day - was the source of much original anti-Jewish feeling.

Gentiles (or, "Goy" as the Jewish Talmud, or holy book, refers to non-Jews of all races, with the literal translation of cattle - which in itself is an important insight of how the writers of the Talmud viewed the outside world) often objected to these Jewish financial practices, accusing them of money lending with exorbitant interest rates (the crime of usury was specifically invented in Europe to control this practice) and other economic exploitation.

The true origins of anti-Jewish feeling therefore lies in a combination of three major factors:

• the self imposed isolation of the Jewish people;
  
  
• the open hostility to Non-Jews as espoused in their ethno-centric and tightly binding religion; and
  
  
• the propensity of their financial dealings.

Thus it was that the first anti-Jewish outbursts occurred long before the introduction of Christianity.

Christianity merely added to these emotions: as the wave of Christian fanaticism swept Europe, all sense of reason or rationality was lost, and, forgetting that Christianity itself had sprung from Judaism, the Christians gave vent to their long simmering dislike of the Jews by accusing them of being the killers of Christ to boot.


Egypt

The first documented anti-Jewish riots broke out in the Egyptian city of Alexandria in 38 AD, recurring again in 66 AD. In 115 - 117 AD, Jews once again came under attack in that city and their synagogue was burned to the ground. In 414 AD, Jews were formally expelled from that city.


Mesopotamia and Persia

In 40 AD, an anti-Jewish riot broke out in the city of Seleucia on the Tigris River, in which a number of Jews were killed. The book of Esther in the Christian Old Testament (and in the Jewish Talmud) deals exclusively with a Persian anti-Jewish movement.


Rome

It was in Imperial Rome that the very first Jewish community in Europe was formally established in 139 BC. It was not long before Roman opinion was aroused against them: they were the subject of frequent attacks in the Roman senate in speeches by amongst others, the famous orator Cicero, around the year 50 BC.

Many other prominent and famous Romans, such as Senecca, Juneval and Tacitus all went on record as complaining about the activities of Jews within the Roman Empire. Anti-Jewish literature was widespread and one work by the Greek, Apion, was so well known that the Romanized Jewish historian Josephus (who wrote an excellent account of the Jewish uprising of A.D. 70 called The Jewish Wars) wrote a whole book trying to refute Apion's arguments.

The Roman emperor, Tiberius, formally expelled the Jews from Rome in 19 AD but they soon returned, only to be expelled once again in 49 AD.

In 116 AD, the emperor Trajan, ordered all Jews in Mesopotamia to be killed, saying that the Jews were the cause of continual uprisings in that region.


The Great Revolt of 66 AD

After the Romans had been invited to annex Palestine by Jewish leaders in an attempt to quell internal political dissension, Jewish nationalists then launched a long running war against the Roman rulers of Palestine. In 66 AD, a violent insurrection, led by the Zealots, a fanatic Jewish sect, was launched against Roman authority. Emperor Nero sent the Roman general Vespian, to put an end to the conflict. By 70 AD, the revolt was crushed and Jerusalem was razed.

The Roman emperor Hadrian ordered Jerusalem rebuilt as a pagan city, to be called Aelia Capitolina, in honor of Jupiter and himself (Publius Aelius Hadrianus); at the same time he issued an edict banning circumcision, a rabbinical law used to identify true Jews.

Jewish agitation against Roman rule continued: under the leader Simon Bar Kokhba, Jewish nationalists fought a doomed battle with the legions of Rome from 132 to 135 AD. As punishment, the victorious Romans then attempted to obliterate all Jewish presence in the province: the name of the land was changed to Syria Palaestina. Jerusalem was made a pagan city, and the death penalty was decreed for any Jew who entered its gates.


ROMAN EMPEROR Justinian LAUNCHES ANTI-JEWISH CAMPAIGN

One of the most famous emperors of the Eastern Roman Empire, Justinian, (527-565 AD) adopted a comprehensive anti-Jewish policy, barring Jews from the civil service, military posts and any other positions of influence in his government.


CONTRADICTORY Christianity CONDEMNS AND ELEVATES JEWS

The coming of Christianity was a double edged sword for the Jews: on the one hand it elevated them into a special place as the "Chosen People" or the "People of the Book" but on the other hand they were made directly responsible for the death of Christ, the crucifixion of God himself.

A common Christian accusation against
Jews - Host Desecration. This entailed
sticking knives or sticks into holy Christian
food used at Mass as a symbol of their
hatred for Christianity. Like many similar
accusations, this was more a figment of
Christian imagination than reality.

This Christ-killing blame was seized upon by anti-Jewish Christians who tried to reconcile the obviously Jewish origins of their religion with their beliefs: in this way, in what are obvious Christian "additions" to the biblical texts, the Jews are made out to be blamed for Christ's death.

In Matthew 27:24-25, the Roman governor of Palestine, Pontius Pilate, when refusing to have anything to do with the crucifixion of Christ, allegedly says that he is innocent of the "blood of this just person" and the Jews respond to him that "his blood be on us, and our children." The Catholic Church only formally repudiated the charge that all Jews are responsible for the death of Christ and at the Second Vatican Council held from 1962-1965, although how they reconciled this with the relevant Biblical passage was never explained.


Insertions AND FABRICATIONS

As there is no direct evidence to show that Jesus actually existed in the form portrayed in the bible, it became easy for Christian anti-Jewish activists to create ever more outrageous anti-Jewish insertions into the bible: Jesus allegedly says of the Jews that 'You are of your father the devil, the master of lies"; in John 1:47 Jesus allegedly says of a Jew, Nathaneal "behold an Israelite in indeed in whom there is no guile"; and in the book of Revelations, reference is made to the Jewish religion as the "synagogue of Satan".

Needless to say, the Christian churches of today cringe when these blatant anti-Jewish outbursts are pointed out to them.

The hostility was however, reciprocated: the Talmud, which is a collection of rabbinical writings added to the Old Testament, contains many violently anti-Gentile remarks, comparing non-Jews to cattle (the origin of the word "Goy" for gentile); comparing non-Jewish women to whores and providing specific instruction on how it is permissible for Jews to cheat non-Jews in business.

Both Christians and Jews then, altered their religious teachings in attempts to whip up hostility to each other in a bizarre semi-religious and semi-racial clash.


Islamic Tolerance of JUDAISM LEADS TO INCREASED ANTI-JEWISH SENTIMENT

The rise of Islam in the Middle East and its later violent spread along North Africa, Spain and south eastern Europe provided a major respite for the Jews, who entered into an informal partnership with the various Islamic powers.

This time in Jewish history is formally known as the period of Islamic tolerance. While initially beneficial for the Jews, it dramatically increased their unpopularity in Europe, where Jews and Muslims were soon regarded to be one and the same: hence the violent outbursts against Jews which accompanied the Crusades.

In 1215, the Fourth Lateran Council of the Roman Catholic church, called by Pope Innocent III, proclaimed an official policy of restrictions and ordered all Jews to wear distinctive badges.

The Muslim conquest of Spain brought peace to the Spanish Jews, who came to occupy prominent positions as statesmen, physicians, financiers, and scholars. The peaceful Spanish era ended in the middle of the 13th century, when the Muslims were driven out of Spain.


JEWS OCCUPY HIGH POSTS IN MOORISH Spain and Portugal

After the decline of the Roman Empire, Jews started settling in larger numbers in Western Europe, with many Sephardic Jews crossing over from Africa into Spain. Hot on their heels came the Muslim Moors, who gave the Jews favored status in Moorish occupied Spain: Jews came to fill the highest position in the Moorish republic of Granada in Spain and owned one-third of all the real estate in Barcelona.

When the Moorish occupation of Spain was finally ended, the Christian victors did not take kindly to what they correctly saw as Jewish collaboration with the Moors. This led to the Spanish version of the inquisition, which was primarily aimed at Jews who had falsely converted to Christianity in an attempt to escape the revenge attacks on Jews carried out by the victorious Christian armies.

Finally, the Jews were formally expelled from Spain in 1492, the same year that Christopher Columbus set foot in the Americas.

Taking its lead from Spain, Portugal expelled its Jews in 1497. Thousands of Spanish Jews migrated to south eastern Europe, which had by then been seized by the Muslims in the form of the Ottoman Turks: there once again they benefited from the Islamic policy of toleration of Jews.

The Turkish occupied city of Constantinople became the site of the largest Jewish community in Europe during the 16th century.


JEWS AND THE BANKING PROFESSION

In most European countries, Jews carried on their traditional stereotype activities: in England, Aaron of Lincoln, a Jewish banker, amassed enough money through his business dealings to finance the building of nine monasteries and the Abbey in Lincolnshire, an exceedingly philanthropic gesture towards his Christian neighbors.

The emergence of international Jewish banking houses such as the Frankfurt Jewish House of Rothschilds, became a feature of European economic life, and in a parody of the Spanish Conversos, many Rothschilds converted to Christianity, partly as an attempt to avoid the anti-Jewish charges leveled against them.

Many leading Jews adopted this tactic of converting to Christianity: the British Jew Benjamin Disraeli became British prime minister as a Christian in 1868; while Karl Marx, author of the Communist Manifesto, was the son of a German Jewish rabbi who had converted to Christianity to be able to practice law in Germany at a time when only Christians could take oath before a court.


JEWISH EXPULSIONS FROM Austria and Italy

In 1420, all Jews in Austria were compelled by law to convert to Christianity: those who did not became the subject of a pogrom which saw still practicing Jews either killed or driven out of that country.

In 1670, all Jews who had settled in Austria since 1420 were formally expelled once again; in 1498 the Jews were expelled from the city of Salzburg, while in 1475 the Jews in Trent, Rinn and Lienz had been the subject of popular riots.

In 1520, the Jews were expelled from the Tyrol region in the southern Alps.

Vienna's most famous mayor, Karl Lueger (1844 - 1910) dismissed Jews from the city's public service and segregated Jews from the public schools.

In Italy, Jews were expelled from Florence in 1495; from Naples in 1541 and Milan in 1597; and from Hungary in 1367.


JEWISH Expulsion FROM England

Jews first entered England in large numbers with the Norman conquest of 1066.

Here the traditional "Blood libel" charge was made against the Jews (a bizarre and patently false allegation which held that Jews drained the blood of young Gentiles for satanic purposes).

A woodcut of the ritual murder, by Jews,
of the Christian boy Simon of Trent, 1453
Accusations such as these flourished in
medieval Europe.

As ridiculous as it was, the Blood Libel was however very common: the famous English writer Geoffrey Chaucer (1340-1400) wrote about the occurrence of Jewish ritual murder in his works, making specific mention of one famous case, that of a young Christian boy, Hugh of Lincoln, whose body had allegedly been found mutilated in a way indicative of some type of sacrifice in 1255.

At the time of the Third Crusade (1189-1190) there were serious anti-Jewish riots all over England, centered on, but not limited to, London. Jews in London were put on trial for Ritual Murder accusations in 1238, 1244 and 1276.

In 1290, England formally expelled every last one its Jews from its borders; most crossing the channel to settle in the Netherlands, Spain or France. Jews were only allowed back into England in 1655 by Oliver Cromwell, who issued a special dispensation granting them permission to settle.


JEWISH Expulsions FROM France

Major anti-Jewish riots broke out across France in 1096 at the time of the First Crusade, as they did across Europe; in the town of Blois, Jews were charged with Ritual Murder and in 1171, and some 31 of their number were burned at the stake after having been found guilty of that crime.

The Fourth Crusade (1235 -1236) saw a particularly violent massacre of a large number of Jews in the province of Brittany; in the city of Carcassone, Jews were expelled in 1253, in 1306 and 1394 - each time managing to come back.

Following an accusation of a ritual murder in the province of Dauphine, Jews were expelled from that region in 1253, returning in 1289. After 1305, a number of orders expelling Jews from the province of Gascony were made; and all Jews were formally expelled from Brittany in 1391. All Jews were formally expelled from Gascony again in 1394.

As avid supporters of the French Revolution, Jews were rewarded when the National Assembly enfranchised Jews in 1791, simultaneously stripping all restrictions which had been placed on them.

Napoleon Bonaparte was given much support by Europe's Jews in his campaigns across Europe, for where ever he went he lifted whatever restrictions there had been upon the Jews. Once again, this was only good for Jews over the short term. The downside came when Napoleon was finally beaten: Jews were associated with the destruction that his military adventures had wrought; virtually all of the reforms he had instituted were reversed as a result.

However, by the 1860s, most of the Jewish communities in Western Europe had more or less been de-ghettoized, and Napoleon's reforms had for the greatest part been re-instituted.


JEWISH Expulsions FROM Germany

The first major outbreak of anti-Jewish feeling in Germany occurred when Jews were expelled from the city of Mainz in 1012; by 1096, Jews had re-established themselves that city, only to be the subject of a massacre and riot in that year at the time of the First Crusade.

During the Black Death bubonic plague outbreak, Jews were blamed for the epidemic by crazed Christian communities: anti-Jewish riots broke out throughout the states of Germany, with a total of 350 different attacks being recorded.

• In 1221, anti-Jewish riots broke out in Erfurt; and in 1241, virtually the entire Jewish community in Frankfurt was either killed or driven out in a serious anti-Jewish riot.
  
  
• In Coblenz, there were anti-Jewish riots in 1265, 1281 and 1287; some 728 Jews were killed during a popular anti-Jewish riot in Nuremberg in 1298; and from 1336 to 1339, a series of attacks on Jews in Alsace, Swabia and Franconia became known as the Armleder attacks.
  
  
• Jews were expelled from the town of Breslau in 1349. Jews were expelled from Nuremberg in 1349; Jews were expelled from the city of Rothenburg in 1349; that same year the Jews had managed to re-establish themselves in Frankfurt: only to be attacked once again and driven out.
  
  
• 
  The Frankfurt Jewish ghetto
  is attacked in 1614.
  Jews were expelled from the province of Trier in 1418; from the town of Dusseldorf in 1428; from the city of Mainz again and again in 1438, 1462 and 1470; each time returning after a while.
  
  
• Jews were expelled from Dresden in 1448 after a large number were found to be behind a coin counterfeiting racket; Jews were expelled from the city of Halberstadt in 1493; By 1499 Jews had managed to re-establish themselves in Nuremberg: in that year they were expelled once again from that city.
  
  
• Jews were expelled from the city of Rothenburg for the second time in 1520.
  
  
• By 1594, Jews had managed to re-establish themselves in the town of Halberstadt, only to be expelled once again in that year.
  
  
• In 1614 Frankfurt once again became the site of serious anti-Jewish riots; in 1796, a major part of the Jewish neighborhood (ghetto) in Frankfurt was razed to the ground in a major anti-Jewish riot.

The creation of the unified German Empire in 1871, saw an end to the organized pogroms which had marked the various individual German states. By this stage however, the heavy Jewish involvement in Communism and international socialism - as personified by the German Jew, Karl Marx, became the focus for anti-Jewish sentiment.


JEWISH Expulsions FROM Poland

In 1399, anti-Jewish riots rocked the city of Posen; in 1407, anti-Jewish riots took place the city of Cracow; and in 1483, Jews were expelled from the city of Warsaw.

In 1491, Jews were expelled from the city of Cracow; a series of anti-Jewish riots took place in the town of Kalisch which lasted in sporadic outbursts for virtually the entire 14th century. In 1656, the entire Jewish community in Kalisch was destroyed by a Polish army under the leadership of one Czarniecki; the riots became known by that name.

The city of Posen was rocked by further anti-Jewish riots in 1648, 1577 and 1687. Nonetheless, Poland became home to a large number of Jews, many of whom bore the brunt of the Nazi occupation of Poland during the Second World War.


JEWISH Expulsions FROM Russia

In 1803, the Russian Archduke Yaroslav the Wise conquered the Khazar people, who had not only converted to Judaism but had absorbed large numbers of Jews who had fled north after the Roman-Jewish war of 70 AD. In 1563, anti-Jewish riots resulted in dozens of deaths at Polotosk and Vitelisk; In 1648,Bogdan Chmielnicki headed a rebellion of Cossack and Ukrainian masses against Jews and Polish landowners. Jewish estimates are that at least 744 Jewish communities were destroyed, and the attacks have come to be known as the Chmielnicki massacres.

In 1667, Jews were expelled from the Ukraine; Jews were expelled from Russia three times, in 1727, 1738 and 1742.

In 1762, Catherine the Great of Russia forbade Jews from living in Russia: still unable to get rid of them, she then in 1791, limited Jews to living in an area of land to the west of the country known as the Pale of Settlement; up against the Polish border: this was to give rise to the large Polish Jewish population in later years.

Tsar Alexander I expelled 20,000 Jews from the province of Vitebsk and Mohilev in 1824; starting in 1881, a series of anti-Jewish riots spread across Russia and all of Eastern Europe, becoming known as the pogroms.

In 1891, popular anti-Jewish riots took place in Moscow which led to the expulsion of Jews from that city in that year; and in the aftermath of the unsuccessful 1905 revolution in Russia; which had seen heavy Jewish involvement, some 600 villages and cities in that country attacked their Jewish inhabitants: hundreds of thousands fled, either to Western Europe or to the United States of America.

In Russia around 1905, the first issue of a document called the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion first appeared, which was subsequently reproduced world wide. This document purports to be the minutes of meeting of Jewish elders planning the conquest of the world through the use of war, money and control of the media.

Despite the Protocols being a very obvious Orthodox Russian Christian fabrication, this document has continued to circulate, achieving huge sales in Japan in the 1980s.

The long standing and deep rooted anti-Jewish feeling amongst Russians, and the Russian ruling class in particular, was one of the major reasons for the heavy Jewish involvement in the Communist Revolution of 1917.


Jews in the United States of America

In the United States, the first sign of any anti-Jewish feeling came with some off the cuff remarks by one of the founders of that country, Thomas Jefferson, who railed against allowing Jews into America during an early session of the Constitutional Congress. The exact details of what he said were not recorded.

At the time of the American Revolution, about 1780, the Jewish population of the colonies numbered an estimated 2000. By 1880, this had risen to an estimated 250,000. A few Jews became prominent at the time of the American Civil War: on the Confederate side the Secretary of State was Judah Benjamin, who fled to England after the fall of the South. The Rothschild banking house, present in both the North and South through subsidiaries, committed itself to neither, doing business with both sides as pressures of the time dictated.

America had however relatively few Jews until the end of the 19th century: then, large numbers of Jews from Eastern Europe started flooding into that country, fleeing persecution in their home countries.

Above left: This cartoon, which appeared in the prestigious American magazine Life of 5 October 1911, reflected a popular concern at the large numbers of Jewish emigrants from Europe into the United States. The "child", America, is being fed Jewish pills by Mother Europe, and complains that the "more I take, the worse I feel". That such a cartoon appeared in a well known mainstream American magazine indicated the level of the public debate on the issue of Jewish immigration into America. Right: A close-up of the Jewish "pill" in this cartoon.

Henry Ford and the "International Jew"

By the 1920s, the identification of Jews with Communism had been made in the United States. The founder of the Ford car company, Henry Ford, became the leading publisher of anti-Jewish material in the United States, issuing free copies of the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion and a copy of his own newspaper, the Dearborn Independent, to all buyers of his cars.

Ford was a Christian anti-Semite, and possibly the realization of the inherent contradiction this entailed, led him to order the retraction of all his former publications and that an apology be issued towards the Jews in his name in 1940.

1920s US Immigration laws DESIGNED TO STOP JEWS ENTERING

By 1920, some 2.5 million Jews from Eastern Europe had emigrated to America: this flood played no small role in the formulation of the 1921 and 1924 Immigration Acts, which effectively shut off most immigration from those countries with large Jewish populations. Jews then started settling in large numbers in other regions: Canada, South America (notably in Argentina), the Union of South Africa, and Palestine. The American policy of barring Jewish immigration was reversed after the Second World War and millions of European Jews then entered that country, leaving Europe for good.


Jews and Communism

The role of Jews in the Russian Communist revolutions has been discussed in an earlier chapter: the large Jewish involvement in that revolution, combined with the Jewishness of Karl Marx, made easy and believable anti-Jewish propaganda for the Nazis, even when mixed with the crude Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.


Anti-Zionism and Anti-Jewishness

Zionism - or a movement amongst Jews to create a homeland for Jews based on racial and ethnic grounds in Palestine, had been started in 1897 by Theodor Herschl in Switzerland. By 1948, the Zionists had succeeded in creating the state of Israel in the Middle East: but this caused a new wave of problems all by itself.

The end of the Second World War did not see an end to anti-Jewish agitation: in the Soviet Union, which had ironically been created by a clique of Communist Jews, anti-Jewish feeling rose with the creation of the state of Israel. Many Soviet Communists saw the existence of the state of Israel and Jewish loyalty towards it as a potential fifth column within the Soviet state.

This was so because in terms of a law in Israel called the Law of Return, all Jews qualified for citizenship of Israel as long as they could prove a direct biological - in other words racial - link to Judaism. This law is still in force to the present day.

Some of the strongest anti-Zionists are found
amongst the ultra-Orthodox Jews. They draw
their anti-Zionism from an injunction in the
Jewish holy books which state that a Jewish
state can only come about after the Jewish
messiah has come, and that therefore the
state of Israel is a blasphemy. Here, anti-Zionist
Jews demonstrate publicly in the USA.

This created a whole set of inhabitants of every country who automatically had split loyalty: combined with the Communist ideology's rejection of racial nationalism (a principle upon which Israel was and is still based) saw the Soviet Union ally itself to the anti-Zionist movement in the Arab world, which objected fiercely to the expulsion of millions of Arab Palestinians from Palestine to make way for the state of Israel.

It is a question of propaganda if anti-Zionism is the same as anti-Jewishness: pro-Zionist Jews always dismiss anti-Zionists as being anti-Jewish. This is however another factual inaccuracy: some of the biggest anti-Zionists are religious Jews who object to the state of Israel on the grounds that it contravenes Talmudic instructions to wait for the Jewish messiah before a state can be established.

It is also semantic tomfoolery to call Arabs "anti-Semitic" - they and the Jews all speak Semitic languages and this epithet serves no use whatsoever.

Finally, many Communist Jews were in the forefront of anti-Zionist activism: these Jews held prominent positions in Soviet society until the fall of Communism itself. The anti-Jewish persecutions in the Soviet Union were in fact anti-Zionist actions: only a small number of genuine anti-Jewish activities took place, and none were ever officially sanctioned by the Soviet state.


JEWISH DOMINATION OF MEDIA IN THE WEST

Whether by deliberate plan or accident, the situation has arisen whereby Jews have ended up dominating the mass media forms of both the USA, and to a slightly smaller extent, of Western Europe. The ownership of the mass media by a small group of Jews is well documented and full details are easily obtainable on the Internet.

The attack on the World Trade Center,
New York, 11 September 2001. The attack,
by Muslims, was caused directly in retaliation
to the support given to Israel by the USA,
which in turn is driven by the Jewish domination
of the American mass media and government.
Such attacks are set to increase as long as the
White West allows its politics and mass media to
be dominated by Jewish groups.

Given the long association between Jews and assorted left-wing causes, varying from hard-core Communism to all manner of pro-Black activities, it is therefore not surprising that the mass media then also mirrors an uniformly pro-non-White message in its portrayal of current events and opinion.

This Jewish domination of the mass media means that what is generally construed as 'public opinion' is in fact always presented in a way which is as sympathetic as possible to Jewish interests. For example, in any news event dealing with a White-on-Black criminal event, the race of the offender is usually mentioned and the issue discussed as a 'race-hate' incident. In reality, as outlined later in this book, Whites are subjected to far more racially-based assaults by non-Whites than the other way round, yet as a general rule, the mass media simply covers this up.

This Jewish domination of the media can, and does, have serious consequences, so vividly illustrated by the 11 September 2001 attacks on New York's World Trade Centre and the Pentagon in Washington, D.C.. These events were triggered exclusively by the unflagging US support given to Israel against the Palestinians.

The fact that the USA - and much of the West - continues to support Israel at any cost - including the deaths of thousands of its own citizens - is the surest evidence yet of the power of the Jewish lobby in both the mass media (which generates 'public opinion') and of the Jewish lobby's famed control over the US government, and to a lesser extent, the governments of Western Europe.


JEWISH DOMINATION OF WEST LEADS TO ISLAMIC HOSTILITY

This Jewish domination of the mass media and the political decision-making process in the USA and Western Europe, will have increasingly serious consequences for the Whites of these parts of the world as the power and anger of the Islamic world spreads. Gentiles in the West are associated with Jews by the Muslims - and not undeservedly so, given the slavish support which the West appears (through the Jewish-dominated mass media and governmental control) to give to Israel and World Jewry.

[Stefanus]

March of the Titans
A History Of The White Race

Chapter 64:The Racial State - The Third Reich


Part One: The Ideological Background of Hitler's Germany

Adolf Hitler is without question the one towering figure over the 20th Century - and perhaps even of the 21st, even if measured only in the reaction against him. Because of this fame, or infamy, Hitler and the Third Reich remain one of the most controversial topics of contemporary history.

Adolf Hitler, a Nordic racial type
with slight Alpine ancestry.

Yet despite all the intense scrutiny and historical evaluation, Hitler and the Third Reich remain one of the most difficult historical areas with which to come to grips. The reason for this is that Hitler still has a massive influence on everyday politics and life at the end of the 20th Century, and it is difficult to find any source which has an objective view of the state created by the Nazis from 1933 to 1945 in Germany.

In fact, a large amount of what has been written about Hitler and Nazi Germany has been particularly subject to the pressure of political correctness: a good example is the story of 1936 Olympics and the Black American athlete Jesse Owens.


The 1936 Olympics

The story most repeated about Hitler and the 1936 Olympic Games in Berlin, which were unquestionably put on as a political showcase for Nazi Germany, is that Hitler refused to shake the hand of the American Black athlete Jesse Owens after the latter had won a race. This myth is extremely widespread: the Encarta Encyclopedia, issued by Microsoft (1998 edition) states the following in its entry under Jesse Owens:

"Owens, Jesse (1913-80), one of the greatest track-and-field athletes of all time . . . A member of the U.S. track team in the 1936 Olympic Games, held in Berlin, Owens won four gold medals. He won the 100-m dash in 10.3 sec, equaling the Olympic record; set a new Olympic and world record of 20.7 sec in the 200-m dash; and won the running broad jump with a leap of 26 ft 5I in., setting a new Olympic record. He was also a member of the U.S. 400-m relay team that year, which set a new Olympic and world record of 39.8 sec. Despite Owens' outstanding athletic performance, German leader Adolf Hitler refused to acknowledge his Olympic victories because Owens was black. Owens went on to play an active role in youth athletic programs and later established his own public relations firm. His autobiography, The Jesse Owens Story, was published in 1970." - "Owens, Jesse," Microsoft Encarta, 98 Encyclopedia.1997 Microsoft Corporation."

The reality was in fact substantially different: what happened was that Hitler personally attended the first day of the track and field competition on 2 August 1936, and did personally congratulate the German athlete Hans Woellke, who became the first German to win a gold medal in the Olympics since 1896.

Throughout the rest of the day, Hitler continued to receive Olympic champions, German and non German, in his VIP box.

The next day, 3 August, the chairman of the International Olympic Committee, Comte Baillet-Latour, approached Hitler early in the morning and told the German leader that he had violated Olympic protocol by having winners paraded to his box.

Hitler apologized and gave a promise that he would from then on refrain from publicly congratulating any winners, German or otherwise. During this day, Owens won his gold medals - and in line with the Olympic Committee's ruling, Hitler did not shake his hand, or anybody else's for that matter, at the games again.

It is therefore utterly false to claim that Hitler deliberately chose to ignore Owens. In fact, in the very autobiography that the Encarta Encyclopedia extract above refers to, The Jesse Owens Story, Owens himself recounted how Hitler had stood up and waved to him:

"When I passed the Chancellor he arose, waved his hand at me, and I waved back at him. I think the writers showed bad taste in criticizing the man of the hour in Germany." - Jesse Owens, The Jesse Owens Story, 1970.

Another common story about the 1936 Olympic games is that Owens' victory "disproved the Nazi master race theory" - in fact the Olympic games as a whole were won by the German team with 89 medals, compared to the 56 medals won by the second placed USA team.

The 1936 Berlin Olympics. Because
they were the first political Olympic
games, there are a huge number of
distortions about the event. One of
the hidden facts was the large degree
of European support for Hitler: here
the French Olympic team enter the
stadium in Berlin, giving the Nazi salute
while marching behind their country's flag.

In what was to become an act of extreme irony, the American president of the time, Franklin D. Roosevelt, then involved in an election and concerned about the reaction in the USA's southern states, refused to see Owens at the White House: Owens was later to remark that it was Roosevelt, not Hitler, who snubbed him.

This is a good example of one of the more outstanding distortions which have sprung up around Nazi Germany, all as a result of a political agenda linked to Nazi Anti-Jewishness. It is also true that it is the victors' prerogative to write the historical account of events: this too has served to cloud the issue of the Third Reich and to make it into the political hot potato that it remains over fifty years after it vanished.


"THE BIG LIE" - HITLER WARNED AGAINST IT

Another good example of the type of deliberately false representation which has sprung up around Hitler and Nazi Germany is the story of the "Big Lie." Most often it is repeated that Adolf Hitler invented the "Big Lie" technique, to the effect that "the bigger the lie, the more people will believe it." It is presented as evidence that Hitler himself used this technique.

Once again, just like the 1936 Olympics, the truth is actually precisely the opposite: in fact Hitler warned against the Big Lie technique, attributing it to his enemies, the Jews.

The quotation from where the 'Big Lie" story emanates, is in Hitler's book, Mein Kampf, Chapter 10, where he writes about the "big lie" technique being used by Jews against the World War German General Ludendorf. It is by deliberately misquoting this section of Mein Kampf, that it is alleged that Hitler propagated the "big lie" technique - when in fact, as can be read, he specifically warned against it:

"But it remained for the Jews, with their unqualified capacity for falsehood, and their fighting comrades, the Marxists, to impute responsibility for the downfall [of Germany in WWI] precisely to the man who alone had shown a superhuman will and energy in his effort to prevent the catastrophe which he had foreseen and to save the nation from that hour of complete overthrow and shame. By placing responsibility for the loss of the world war on the shoulders of Ludendorff they took away the weapon of moral right from the only adversary dangerous enough to be likely to succeed in bringing the betrayers of the Fatherland to Justice.

All this was inspired by the principle -- which is quite true in itself -- that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily, and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. These people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest purposes.

From time immemorial, however, the Jews have known better than any others how falsehood and calumny can be exploited. Is not their very existence founded on one great lie, namely, that they are a religious community, whereas in reality they are a race? And what a race! One of the greatest thinkers that mankind has produced has branded the Jews for all time with a statement which is profoundly and exactly true. He (Schopenhauer) called the Jew "The Great Master of Lies." Those who do not realize the truth of that statement, or do not wish to believe it, will never be able to lend a hand in helping Truth to prevail."

- Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Chapter X

NAZIS SUPPRESS DEMOCRACY

A trademark characteristic of Hitler and the Nazi Party - they never made any secret of it - was their abhorrence of democracy. Firmly believing in the leadership principle, where one leader took the responsibility for the major decisions, as soon as the Nazis came to power, they started with a program of entrenching themselves in power to the exclusion of other parties and opposition movements.

This anti-democratic movement extended past the political front: freedom of the press and eventually freedom of speech was also suspended. Although these were reversals of the democratic process, Germany was not alone in this: indeed, even at the end of the 20th century, still only one country on earth - the United States of America - guarantees its citizens total freedom of speech: every single other country on earth has one or another form of restriction on free speech, most notably in the area of race relations, where all European countries have made it a criminal offense to discuss racially related topics which are openly debated in America.


Hitler Elected to Office

It was thus ironic that Hitler came to power by being voted into office, and not through a coup (although he tried that early in his career in 1923; he failed and served nine months in prison as a result).

In the election of March 1933, the Nazi party received the single largest share of the vote, giving them 44 per cent of the seats in the German parliament. This in itself was not an outright majority, but when the smaller nationalist and right wing parties were added to the Nazi total, Hitler in effect had 52% of the popular vote behind him. These smaller parties were to later of their own free will merge with the Nazi Party.

Fifty two percent of the popular vote is a total that most modern politicians would regard as an overwhelming majority: Most Western European governments come to power with far less, usually around 30 to 40 per cent of the vote.

Hitler and hundreds of thousands
of his followers gather at a rally:
the Nazi leader was unquestionably
the single most popular elected
leader of all time.

Once in power, the Nazis then combined their mastery of propaganda with an extended program of political and social reform. Within three years, this had persuaded the vast majority of Germans to vote for Hitler. Upon taking office in 1933, Hitler made a public speech asking the Germans for four years in office, after which he would hold a referendum to test the popularity of his government. This referendum was duly held with the simple question " Do you approve of the National Socialist Government or not" being printed on the ballot papers.

The result even surprised Hitler: a staggering 44,461,2787 "yes" votes, or 98.8 per cent of the qualified voter total of 45,453,691 was recorded. "No" votes amounted to a paltry 540,211 total. (Baynes, Hitler's Speeches, 1922-1939, Vol. 2 Royal Institute of International Affairs, London).

Even taking into account that some people might have been too frightened to express opposition, this still indicates a level of support which would be unobtainable by any politician in any modern democracy.


Internal Policies

Hitler's personal popularity remained very high for almost the entire duration of the war, and serves as the single most important reason why Germans fought to the bitter end without large scale mutiny, as had happened in the First World War. This was astonishing in itself: but even more amazing when it is considered that the Nazi state became ever more authoritarian in nature.

It was not long before the Communist Party had been outlawed: Germany quickly became a one party state and all other parties were eventually outlawed. Germans were given the right to vote every now and then in referendums on set issues only: in each and every case they returned over 98 per cent endorsements for whatever the government had done.

Literature and art deemed to be undesirable was placed on a banned index: this automatically included any works by Jews, but also many non-Jews. The famous book burning incident occurred only once: after that, books deemed undesirable were simply not printed in Germany any more.


Economic Reforms

On all fronts, the German state was revolutionized: with one of the most significant being with the economy. When Hitler came to power in 1933, 30 per cent of the working population was unemployed: by 1938, Germany had a labor shortage.

In this economic recovery, Hitler hit upon something which helped to arouse the everlasting hatred of the international banking community: instead of basing Germany's recovery on enormous loans from foreign and local banks, Hitler based the German economy onto a barter system, by which he could get much of what he needed by exchanging German surplus for the surplus of other countries - in common language, by swapping.

The next radical change Hitler brought about was to take the right to print money away from private banking institutions - which he viewed as Jewish - and restored the sole right to print money to the German state itself (it is interesting to compare the contemporary systems in both Britain and America, where consortiums of private bankers - the Federal Reserve in America and the Bank of England - print the money and then "sell" it to the governments, incurring the massive national debts of these countries).

Freed of the peculiar and complicated system of instant national debt through the issuance of their own money, the German economy took off like a rocket. Hitler also abandoned the Gold Standard as a means of weighting the Reichsmark: money in Hitler's Germany was not based on gold but on the capacity of the German people to produce goods.

Hitler said in 1937:

"We were not foolish enough to try to make a currency coverage of gold of which we had none, but for every mark that was issued we required the equivalent of a mark's worth of work done or goods produced. . . .we laugh at the time our national financiers held the view that the value of a currency is regulated by the gold and securities lying in the vaults of a state bank." (CC Veith, Citadels of Chaos, Meador, 1949.)

Workers' Rights

Labor Unions were dissolved and reformed under the authority of the state controlled Labor Front. The right of workers to strike and of management to lock workers out were both forbidden, and the state actively intervened in labor disputes. The unemployment problem was tackled by the creation of great building projects, most notably Hitler's pet project, the Autobahns.

The standard of living increased dramatically, with workers for the first time being able to travel abroad in state sponsored holidays through the "Strength through Joy" program.

Children were obligated to serve in the Hitler Youth or its female equivalent as a form of national service: the meetings of these youth organizations were timed to be on Sundays at exactly the times that the main churches held their services. Soon the pews began to empty of young people who preferred to go camping or playing sport rather than sitting in church.


Nazi Atomic Science

Another common myth about Nazi Germany is that the country was not able to build an atomic bomb of its own because it rejected the "Jewish science" of Albert Einstein and other Jewish scientists.

This has however been proven to be untrue with the 1999 release of previously top secret files on Nazi Germany's race to build an atomic bomb. Among the materials now available to the general public in the Munich state museum, are research notes by famous German physicists who took part in the program, such as Werner Heisenberg and Otto Hahn, as well as notebooks, photos and correspondence between scientists and Nazi authorities.

The documents show that German research into the atomic bomb was parallel with efforts in the United States, but that the Third Reich lacked materials to build one only because of the Allied bombing campaign.

A November 1945 report by two U.S. investigators, six months after the German defeat in World War II, says ``only the lack of plutonium'' kept Adolf Hitler from building an atomic bomb. (Nazi Atom Bomb Files To Be Opened, Associated Press, January 1999).

If the Allied bombing campaign had been any less severe, there can be no doubt that Nazi Germany would have been able to build an atomic bomb as well - which may well have changed the course of the war.


Medical Advances

An overview of Nazi medical advances makes interesting reading for the modern health conscious person: Nazi scientists were amongst the first in the world to warn of the dangers of radiation; asbestos, lead, cadmium and mercury (all of which have only re-emerged in the health field many years after the end of the Second World War, when much German medical research was dismissed as Nazi hallucinations).

In addition to this, German medical journals of the 1930s and 1940s were the first in the world to warn against the ill effects of artificial food colorants and preservatives in food and drinks, and stressed the need for a return to "organic" or natural ingredients in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, fertilizers and foods.


Vivisection Outlawed

The very first law passed by the Nazi controlled parliament of the territory of East Prussia in 1933, under the premiership of Herman Goering, was the abolition of vivisection, or experimentation on animals.

This law also included a ban on the Jewish ritual whereby meat is made kosher: the ritual includes the slitting of an animal's throat and letting it bleed to death while a rabbi prays over the dying animal: this was rejected by the Nazis as a barbaric way of slaughtering animals which inflicted unnecessary pain. Eventually the anti-vivisection law was extended throughout Germany.

Nazi Germany also forbid the use of the pesticide DDT on the grounds that it was a health hazard (it would be decades before this policy was adopted by other countries) and instead used a German produced version known as Cyclone-B.

"Is smoking hazardous to your health?" reads
this anti-smoking article in the Nazi publication,
Gesundes Volk ("Healthy People") April 1939.
The illustration on the left shows the amount
of tobacco consumed by Germans in one year
(1935) is equal to the weight of one million
people, and that in one year "our people spend
2.5 billion Reichmarks on tobacco; for the same
amount we could buy 2.5 million Volkswagens."

Hitler Backed Anti-Smoking Drive

Nazi Germany was also the first country in the world to actively launch anti-smoking campaigns: in July 1939, the Bureau against the Dangers of Alcohol and Tobacco was founded, with the Reich Health Office sponsoring cash prizes for research into the effects of nicotine upon human chromosomes. In June 1942, the Institute For The Struggle Against Tobacco was founded at the University of Jena in Saxony, funded personally by Hitler who gave 100,000 Reichmarks of his own personal money to the project. By 1944, Germany had also become the first country in the world to ban smoking on public transport.


NAZIS DISCOURAGE Alcohol ABUSE

In 1937, the Nazis enacted laws prohibiting the sale of alcohol to minors and enacted stiff penalties for drunken-driving, introducing the first blood tests for automobile drivers suspected of being under the influence while behind the steering wheel.

As part of the state's efforts to control drinking, the SS undertook the promotion of mineral water. The SS's business interests in mineral water extended to the point where by 1945 it controlled 75 per cent of all Germany's mineral water production.


HITLER AND CHRISTIANITY

Also contrary to popular belief, Hitler and the Nazis were not Christians, and were in fact vehemently opposed to that religion, which they saw as a Jewish originated belief system. In public, Hitler accepted or even praised Christianity when it was anti-Jewish, but in private, he detested it, as a reading of his personal dinner table chat recorded by Martin Borman and published as "Hitler's Secret Conversations", Farrar, Straus and Young, New York, 1953:

“The heaviest blow that ever struck humanity was the coming of Christianity. Bolshevism is Christianity's illegitimate child. Both are inventions of the Jew. The deliberate lie in the matter of religion was introduced into the world by Christianity. Bolshevism practices a lie of the same nature, when it claims to bring liberty to men, whereas in reality it seeks only to enslave them. In the ancient world, the relations between men and gods were founded on an instinctive respect. It was a world enlightened by the idea of tolerance. Christianity was the first creed in the world to exterminate its adversaries in the name of love. Its keynote is intolerance.

Without Christianity, we should not have had Islam. The Roman Empire, under Germanic influence, would have developed in the direction of world-domination, and humanity would not have extinguished fifteen centuries of civilization at a single stroke.

Let it not be said that Christianity brought man the life of the soul, for that evolution was in the natural order of things."

- Adolf Hitler, ibid, Night of 11th-12th July 1941.

"Christianity is a rebellion against natural law, a protest against nature. Taken to its logical extreme, Christianity would mean the systematic cultivation of the human failure."

- Adolf Hitler, ibid, 10th October 1941, midday.

[Stefanus]

March of the Titans
A History Of The White Race

Chapter 64: The Racial State - The Third Reich


Part Two: Racial Hygiene - Nazi Germany's Racial Laws

In addition to the political reforms which proved to be so popular, (even the undemocratic ones), the Nazi government also implemented a number of far reaching racial laws. These laws covered a huge number of areas: from eugenics (the basis of which had been laid in America, not Germany, as outlined in an earlier chapter); prohibition of mixed marriages between Germans, Jews and all who were not German citizens or who not could become German citizens - and this included non-Whites.

"We do not stand alone" - Nazi propaganda
justifying the 1934 sterilization law, shows
a German couple surrounded by the flags of
nations which already had identical laws.
Neues Volk, 1936.

Sterilization Law

On 14 July 1934, the German government passed the law for the Prevention of Genetically Diseased Offspring, also known as the Sterilization Law. In terms of this law an individual could be sterilized if, in the opinion of specially established courts, that person suffered from any genetic diseases, identified as feeblemindedness, schizophrenia, insanity, genetic epilepsy, Huntington's chorea, genetic blindness or deafness, or severe alcoholism (interestingly enough, it was only in the early 1990's that American scientists "rediscovered" the genetic link to alcoholism).

This law, for which Nazi Germany became infamous, was however by no means the first such law: in 1928, the Swiss canton of Waadt had passed a law in terms of which the mentally ill could be sterilized; in 1929, Denmark had passed similar sterilization legislation; Norway passed sterilization laws in 1934; followed by Sweden in 1935; Finland (1935); Estonia (1936) and Iceland (1938). Other states that passed sterilization laws included Mexico, Cuba, Latvia, Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia, Lithuania, Latvia, and Hungary.

In 1907, the American state of Indiana had passed a sterilization law; by 1930, a further 28 American states and one Canadian province had followed suit, resulting in the sterilization of some 15,000 persons before 1930. By 1939, more than 30,000 people in 29 American states had been sterilized. (Racial Hygiene, Medicine under the Nazis, Robert N. Proctor, Harvard University Press, 1988).


Nazi Eugenics

The German eugenicist movement was directed primarily against Germans, not Jews. German medical research held that degenerate Whites posed a major threat to German society because of their propensity to greater reproductive levels: in this view, the Nazis were certainly not alone. In 1930, the women's supplement to the Social Democratic Party's newspaper, Vorwaarts, criticized the 1929 Danish sterilization law for not allowing the compulsory sterilization of "inferiors."

In 1931, even the German Communist Party expressed itself in support of sterilization of psychiatric patients under certain conditions. (Racial Hygiene, Medicine under the Nazis, Robert N. Proctor, Harvard University Press, 1988).

As a result of the German Sterilization law, somewhere between 350,000 and 400,000 people had been sterilized in that country by the end of the war in 1945 - none of them Jews and with the only non-Whites being 500 children born of sexual relationships between German women and Black French soldiers who had been used to occupy the Rhineland area after World War One.

Nazi eugenics was primarily concerned with German Whites, not other races. The word "Untermensch" (or sub-man) was actually used to refer to degenerate Whites, not other races. In this illustration from the 1937 publication Volk in Gefahr (A People in Danger), the problem of criminal Whites is addressed so: "The Threat of the Underman. It looks like this: Male criminals had an average of 4.9 children, criminal marriage, 4.4 children, parents of slow learners, 3.5 children, a German family 2.2 children, and a marriage from the educated circles, 1.9 children."

Mother's Cross

Imitating ancient Greek and Roman attempts to encourage population growth, the German government rewarded those families with large numbers of children: a special Mother's Cross was struck, given in bronze to German women who had four children, silver for six children and gold for eight. Hundreds of thousands of these medals were given out before the war ended. Financial payments and tax concessions were also offered for large numbers of children.

A combination of these incentives, the abolition of abortions (except in cases of the mentally ill) and the expansion of the borders of Germany eventually caused an increase (over and above what would have been the case had Hitler not come to power) in the number of children born in Germany during the Third Reich era of just over three million.


The Nuremberg Laws

In September 1935, the German government passed the Reich Citizenship Law which effectively limited citizenship of Germany to only those of "German and related blood who through their behavior make it evident that they are willing and able faithfully to serve the German people and nation." Jews and other non-Germans were reclassified as aliens and denied German citizenship.

The Blood Protection Law, proclaimed on the same day, forbade all sexual relations between Germans and non-Germans, based on citizenship. This effectively forbade marriages between Germans, Jews and non-Whites alike.

To address the issue of already existing marriages and children, the law defined a Jew as a person who had two (out of the four) Jewish grandparents - less than that and the person was classed as a German, and allowed to marry other Germans - a Nazi concession to the fact that many European Jews were to all practical purposes European in racial make-up.

In fact, the Blood Protection Law specifically forbade such "one quarter Jews" from marrying other "one quarter Jews" - this was done to promote the further dissolution of Jewish genes, conversely to prevent the strengthening of any Jewish gene pool in Germany which might result from such unions.

Contrary to propaganda surrounding the Third Reich, many of these one quarter Jews served the new German government faithfully, serving in all areas of the Reich's administration, including in the armed forces, without persecution of any sort.

The Nuremberg laws had strict genetic rules as to who was a Jew and who was not: a person was only classified as Jewish if they had more than two Jewish grandparents. This chart, issued by the Reich Health Office in 1936, is an overview or "admissibility of marriage between Aryans and non-Aryans." The white circles represent "pure Germans", the circles with black indicate the proportion of Jewish blood. Allowable (zulassig) was a marriage between full Aryan and a one-quarter Jew; not allowed (verboten) was a marriage between a one quarter Jew and a three quarters Jew - an interesting example of how the laws actually sought to dissipate the Jews into Germany.

It was not without irony that these laws of who was a Jew and who was not a Jew, were drawn up in consultation and approval with the German Council of Jews, particularly those who were in favor of the Zionist movement and who wanted Jews to leave Europe to settle what was then Palestine.

The third and last racial law passed by the German government was the Law for the Protection of the Genetic Health of the German People, promulgated in October 1935. This law required couples wishing to marry to submit themselves to a medical examination before marrying to see if any genetically undesirable traits might be passed on to children born of such a union: the law forbade marriage between individuals suffering from venereal disease, feeble mindedness, epilepsy, or any of the diseases encompassed in the Sterilization Law. Those who were classed as bearing such genetically undesirable traits, were only allowed to marry if they agreed to be sterilized, so that no children would be born of the marriage.

Euthanasia Project sees 70,273 incurable retarded people put to death

In 1938, a German father by the name of Knauer wrote to Hitler asking that his child, born blind, retarded and with one arm and one leg, be granted a mercy death, or euthanasia. The case so moved Hitler that he ordered his personal physician to establish if the claims were true, and if so, that the child be granted euthanasia. This Knauer case was to be the start of a legal euthanasia program, the first in Western civilization since the times of the Spartans and early Romans, who had also engaged in mercy killings of severely retarded and deformed children.

In all, some 5,000 retarded and deformed children were granted euthanasia by the German government before the end of the war - with each case being individually reviewed by a specially appointed committee. The policy of administering euthanasia to retarded and deformed children was then also extended to incurably insane adults. Thanks to the German habit of keeping meticulous records, the exact number of incurably insane adults granted euthanasia is known: 70,273.

Although the adult euthanasia project was conducted in secret, it was impossible to conceal such things from the German public, and by 1941, news of the mercy killings had been leaked. Growing public pressure on the Nazi government forced the abandonment of the program in that year.

[Stefanus]

March of the Titans
A History Of The White Race

Chapter 64: The Racial State - The Third Reich


Part Three: European Support For Hitler

Hitler was not only popular in Germany: many Europeans of other nationalities openly supported the Nazi ideology and volunteered, either as workers or as military servicemen and women, to actively assist the German war effort.

This support for Nazism was widespread: sweeping across the European continent from Britain, Ireland, France, the Low Countries, Scandinavia, Eastern Europe right into Russia itself. Of the more famous pro-National Socialist movements with large followings: the British Union of Fascists and National Socialists, the Francistes in France, the Rexist party in Belgium, the Dutch National Socialist Bund, the Iron Guard in Romania and the Russian National Liberation Army, amongst others.

Above: In France, anger at the pre-war Jewish Prime Minister Leon Blum’s repression of democracy and banning of French nationalist groups saw a dramatic rise in support for the Franciste movement after the German occupation of France in 1940. Here, a Franciste rally at the Velodrome d’Hivier in Paris, attended by thousands. Below left: The British Union of Fascists and National Socialists rally in Earl's Court, London, 1936 - one of the largest public meetings ever held in that country. Below right: BUFNS leader Oswald Mosely addresses an open air meeting in Limehouse, London. Below: Foreign labor in the Reich: Millions of Europeans voluntarily migrated to Germany during the war to work for the German armaments and other industries while large numbers of Germans themselves were called up to military service. Here, labor delegates representing nineteen nations visit Berlin, 1941. Visible signs in the picture show representatives from Romania, Belgium, the Ukraine and Serbia.

Contrary to post-war propaganda, the Nazis were not seen by all Europeans as invaders, but often as welcome allies by elements of the resident populations.

Below left: Dutch National Socialists greet German troops pouring into Holland with the Hitler salute, and below right, ecstatic Ukrainians welcome the German Army into their land with the Hitler salute, regarding the Nazis as salvation from what they saw as Jewish Communism.

One of the most striking example of this popularity came with the emergence of the first pan-European army, the Waffen-SS. The SS, or Schutzstaffel (defense echelons), had started as a small bodyguard unit for Hitler's personal protection: it grew into the ideological army of the Nazi Party, eventually forming a state within the state, with its own officers and infrastructure.

The SS developed three distinct branches: the Gestapo, or political police; the Hitler bodyguard unit; and eventually their own army, called the Waffen-SS ("fighting SS").

The Waffen SS became, ironically enough, the best known SS division, even though it was the last to be created, and often the Waffen SS is confused with the Gestapo, who administered the concentration camps and were completely separate to the Waffen-SS.

The Waffen-SS was an entirely voluntary, ideological army. Because of its voluntary nature, it developed a unique spirit amongst its members. In the ordinary German army, the Wehrmacht, soldiers were under strict orders to keep their trunks containing their personal possessions locked at all times to prevent theft. In the Waffen-SS all personal trunks were open at all times by order: no Waffen-SS man was expected to steal from another Waffen-SS man. This rule was easily enforced after one famous incident: two Waffen-SS men were caught stealing from a fellow soldier's trunk: they were both shot, buried without gravestones and the entire regiment then marched over their graves. There was never again a single incident of theft in the whole Waffen-SS.


SS-LEADER Heinrich Himmler SPEAKS on the White Race

A poster, in French, detailing the
European crusade against
Communism, showing the national
flags of all the countries who
committed soldier volunteers to
the German war effort. The only
country missing from this list was
a small detachment of British
volunteers.

A valuable insight into exactly how the Nazis viewed other European populations is afforded through the memoirs of Artur Silgailis, chief of staff of Inspection General the Latvian Legion, the Latvian Waffen-SS, in his book "Latvian Legion" (James Bender Publishing, 1986, pages 348-349.) In that book, Silgailis describes a conversation he had with Heinrich Himmler, head of the SS and the second most powerful man in Nazi Germany:

"He (Himmler) then singled out those nations which he regarded as belonging to the German family of nations and they were: the Germans, the Dutch, the Flemish, the Anglo-Saxons, the Scandinavians and the Baltic people. 'To combine all of these nations into one big family is the most important task at the present time' (Himmler said). 'This unification has to take place on the principle of equality and at that same time has to secure the identity of each nation and its economical independence, of course, adjusting the latter to the interests of the whole German living space. . . After the unification of all the German nations into one family, this family. . . has to take over the mission to include, in the family, all the Roman nations whose living space is favored by nature with a milder climate...I am convinced that after the unification, the Roman nations will be able to persevere as the Germans...This enlarged family of the White race will then have the mission to include the Slavic nations into the family also because they too are of the White race . . . it is only with such a unification of the White race that the Western culture could be saved from the Yellow race . . . At the present time, the Waffen-SS is leading in this respect because its organization is based on the principle of equality. The Waffen-SS comprises not only German, Roman and Slavic, but even Islamic units and at the same time has proven that every unit has maintained its national identity while fighting in close togetherness . . . I know quite well my Germans. The German always likes to think himself better but I would like to avert this. It is important that every Waffen-SS officer obeys the order of another officer of another nationality, as the officer of the other nationality obeys the order of the German officer."

This private discussion is illuminating, as it shatter a few myths which have arisen around Nazi Germany's racial policies: namely that the Nazis viewed Germans as the only superior race, and that they regarded Latin or Slavic nations as inferior. Both these allegations are utterly false, as revealed here in Himmler's own words.

Above left: General Augustin Muñoz Grandes, leader of the Blue Division volunteers from Spain who fought on the Eastern Front alongside their German allies. Above right: Two Spanish Blue Division volunteers with the Luftwaffe on the Eastern Front.

60 PERCENT OF THE WAFFEN SS WERE NON-GERMANS

The Waffen-SS was also the foremost indicator of the popularity of Nazism beyond the borders of Germany: it is a little known fact that of the one million men who served in the Waffen-SS during the course of the war, 60 per cent - 600,000 men - were volunteers from countries outside of Germany. Ethnic Germans were in fact a minority of the Waffen-SS, a fact often forgotten.

Non-German volunteers came from the Netherlands, Belgium, Finland, France, Denmark, Norway, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, the Ukraine, Byelorussia, Spain, Italy, Hungary, Yugoslavia and even a very small group of British volunteers, known as the Legion of St. George.

The foreign Waffen-SS units were all deployed on the Eastern Front for two reasons: firstly they had specifically volunteered to fight Communism; and secondly so that they would never be asked to fight fellow countrymen in their native countries. All but a few thousand of the 20,000 French Waffen-SS volunteers, organized into a division called Legion Charlemagne, were killed in the Battle of Berlin in 1945.

Above left: French Waffen-SS volunteers of the Legion Charlemagne in Smolensk, Soviet Union, on the Eastern Front, 1943. Note the French flag arm flash. Above right: With "Heil Hitler" and "Vive le France" scrawled on their train, French SS volunteers leave Paris for the Eastern Front. The Legion Charlemagne was to distinguish itself in combat right up to the end of the war, when it was almost wiped out in the Battle of Berlin. Above: French Waffen-SS men, returning from the Eastern Front, march down the Champs-Elysées. Above: Leon Degrelle, a Belgian who became a Waffen-SS General, takes the salute at a Belgian Waffen-SS march past in Brussels, 1944. Degrelle took personal part in the fighting on the Eastern Front, escaping to Spain at the end of the war. Hitler once remarked that if he had a son, he would wish for Degrelle. Despite massive hardship, Degrelle retained his devotion to Hitler right up to his death - in exile - in 1984. Above left: The Scandinavian countries contributed heavily to the Waffen SS - here two Danish men stand guard at a 'Regiment Nordland" recruiting station in Copenhagen. Above right: Dutch SS march through Amsterdam. The Dutch provided the single largest volume of volunteers for the SS out of any European nation.

RUSSIANS VOLUNTEER IN THEIR THOUSANDS TO FIGHT COMMUNISTS

Above left: Cossacks, from the steppes of Russia, volunteered for the Waffen SS, fighting bravely for the National Socialist Cause against the Communists. Above right: General Andrei Andreevich Vlassov, a former Soviet Army General who, when captured by the Germans, asked to raise an anti-Communist army. His ‘Russian Army of Liberation’ who fought heroically against the Soviets right until the end of the war, when the Western Allies turned him and his surviving over to the Soviets. Most were executed. Here, Vlassov inspects a unit of his Russian army, equipped by the Germans.

The Waffen SS also recruited heavily amongst Russians, Ukrainians, Cossacks, Latvians, Lithuanians and Estonians. Thousands more Russians volunteered for service with the German army: in 1944, they were organized into a separate unit under a former Soviet Army general, Vlassov, who had been taken prisoner by the Germans very early in the war.

Vlassov and his Russian army fought bitterly until the end, and when all was lost he and thousands of his soldiers fled into the West to surrender to the Americans and British rather than face capture by the Soviets. His hope was misplaced: in an operation codenamed Keelhaul, Vlassov and around 20,000 of his soldiers were then handed over to the Soviets by the Western allies: unsurprisingly, they were never heard of again.


SUPPORT DISSIPATED BY DEFEAT AND REPRISAL MASSACRES

This widespread support for Hitler and National Socialism had however been dissipated by the end of the war, mainly due to the defeat - and subsequent propaganda against - of Nazi Germany. Few people chose to actively associate themselves with a defeated enemy who had effectively been demonized as well.

In addition, the German tactic of taking reprisals against civilian population for the activities of resistance groups, further served to alienate non-Germans. Resistance movements, encouraged by the Allied powers, sprang up in almost all of the occupied countries, despite the fact that they were in breach of the Geneva Convention, which specifically stated that once a country had formally surrendered, it was a breach of that convention to once again take up arms.

These most famous of these reprisals - which were always in retaliation for guerilla activities - took place in Oradour in France, Lidice in Czechoslovakia (in both these instances, entire villages were wiped out, creating much bitterness), in Amsterdam in the Netherlands, (where groups of civilians were rounded up at random and shot in public squares), and at several places on the Eastern Front.

Even though events then caused support for Hitler to have almost evaporated by 1945, the fact remains that prior to his defeat, his popularity amongst Europeans generally was significant and growing, an unpalatable fact for many people today.

[Stefanus]

March of the Titans
A History Of The White Race

Chapter 64: The Racial State - The Third Reich


Part Four: The "Final Solution": Nazi Policy towards Jews

The Third Reich and Adolf Hitler will always be associated with an outburst of anti-Jewish sentiment not seen since the Crusades or the Middle Ages. Despite countless books and films having been created on the actual anti-Jewish activities themselves, almost none have focused on trying to explain why Hitler and the Nazi Party were anti-Jewish.

Nazi anti-Jewishness was based on three pillars:

• First, Jews were identified with political subversion and Communism in particular. (See chapter 61:"Jews and Communism") As outlined earlier, this sentiment was by no means a Nazi invention, and had been written about in public by Winston Churchill and a host of others including Henry Ford in America; the political subversion of which Jews were accused ranged from the fantastic (the Protocols of Zion) to the promotion of pornography, racial mixing, degenerate art ("modern art") and other issues identified as problematic by the Nazis;
  
  
• 
  Nazi propaganda depicting Jews (Stars
  of David); Capitalism, (Dollar Signs) and
  Communism (Hammer and Sickles) all as
  part of the disease under inspection.
  Secondly, the Nazis associated Jews with super capitalism and economic exploitation. This descended directly from the traditional and pre-Christian objections to Jews. Hitlerian anti-Jewishness also accentuated the links between Jewish super capitalists and Communism, personified by the financing of the 1917 Russian Revolution by the American Jewish banker Jacob Schiff; and
  
  
• Thirdly, the Nazis associated Christianity with Jews, arguing that this religion was the product of Middle Eastern thought and not native Europe. The Nazis did not however dare to attack Christianity openly, rather leaving it alone to wither by itself, something that has to a large degree started to become reality by the end of the 20th century. Nonetheless, if the private comments of Hitler himself on Christianity - see the first section of this chapter - are read, it can be seen that Hitler clearly identified Christianity with Jews.

Only in this light can an understanding of the motivating factors behind the state that Hitler created be gained: a tradition of anti-Semitism going back centuries, modern political thought associating Jews with Communism and subversion, the degradation of Germany under the Treaty of Versailles, economic collapse, and the outstanding oratorical ability of Hitler himself. All of these factors combined to propel the Nazi Party to power in 1933.


1933: Jewish Declaration of War on Germany

The very first declaration of war which led up the Second World War was in fact made on 23 March 1933, when a meeting of Jewish leaders from around the world formally and publicly declared war on the Hitler government, which at that stage was only two months old and had passed none of its racial laws.

The Jewish declaration of war was carried publicly by a large number of newspapers, including the Daily Express in London, which ran a bold full-page headline "Judea Declares War on Germany" on its edition of 24 March 1933. Calling on all "Jews of the world to unite" the meeting of Jewish leaders resolved to launch a series of mass demonstrations and also to institute a worldwide boycott of German goods, presumably through their international business connections.

On 24 March 1933, newspapers across the world carried the news that the leaders of the world's Jews had declared war on Germany: the first declaration of war of the Second World War, and an event which goes a long way to explaining why Britain and France declared war on Germany in 1939 for invading Poland, but not on the Soviet Union for doing exactly the same thing. The Second World War broke against Germany, not the Soviet Union, primarily because of Jewish pressure to destroy the anti-Jewish Germany; rather than a genuine concern for the Poles.

Unwittingly, this public declaration of war on Germany only served to inflame anti-Jewish feeling in Germany: the German government barred Jews from holding public office or "positions of influence" which were defined as university lecturing posts, journalists or newspaper editors, amongst others.

This declaration of war also provided the legal basis upon which Germany would later justify its internment of large numbers of Jews inside Germany: America had after all, interned its Japanese, as had Canada, and Britain had interned all its Italians. If Jews had declared themselves at war with Germany, the Nazis argued, then it would not be unreasonable to treat them as a hostile group and intern them as well. Despite this, not all Jews were interned, even right through the war.

So it was that when the Soviet Army occupied Berlin in 1945, a fully functioning Jewish community a few thousand strong, complete with synagogue, was still in existence in the German capital.


The Concentration Camps

Nazi Germany is however most known for its concentration camps, and particularly those in which large numbers of emaciated and dead prisoners were discovered at the end of the war, and which have become synonymous with any image of that era. The first concentration camps were set up soon after the Nazis came to power, with the best known being Dachau, which is situated to the north of Munich.

These camps were in fact large prisons, and the prisoners were sentenced by civil courts to fixed terms of imprisonment which depended upon the crime committed. These crimes could be overtly political - membership or activism in the banned Communist Party was common - but was also extended to all other crimes, including conventional criminal activities such as theft or robbery. Eventually homosexuals were also interned: although this would only occur quite a while later.

It was in fact a former Communist, who had been sentenced to imprisonment in the Dachau concentration camp for several months, and then released, who planted a bomb at the Munich beer cellar in November 1939. The bomb very nearly killed Hitler (he left early: if he had kept to the program for the speech that night, he would most certainly have been killed). The fact that the perpetrator was a former camp inmate, released after the war had started, is however the point: it showed that sentencing to the concentration camps was not necessarily a permanent condition and that it was not Jews alone who were sent to the camps.

That imprisonment at the camps was not necessarily permanent, has been proven beyond question by the uncovering in the Moscow State archives of a release note for a prisoner from Auschwitz itself in 1944 - supposedly at the height of that camp's gas chamber operations.

Above: A prisoner's release note from the Auschwitz-Birkenau camp, dated 1944. The release note, discovered in the Moscow State Archives, gives the prisoner's name and date of release - 8 June 1944. The belief that imprisonment at Auschwitz meant gassing is belied by the release of prisoners from this camp and by the fact that many thousands of inmates did in fact survive.

It was however so that a large number of Communists who were interned were Jews: however, by the time that the Second World War broke out in September 1939, the majority of Germany's Jews - some 319,900 out of a total population of 500,000 - had emigrated from Germany for good, leaving only some 180,000 Jews in Germany itself. (Racial Hygiene, Medicine Under the Nazis, Robert N. Proctor, Harvard University press, 1988). As the existence of the Jewish community in Berlin in 1945 showed, not even all of these had been interned during the war.

Conditions in the Nazi camps worsened
during the war, particularly when the
large scale bombing of Germany started
destroying supply lines in late 1944 and
early 1945. Nightmarish scenes such as
these awaited Allied troops when they
seized the camp of Bergen Belsen in
northern Germany. These corpses were
not killed by gas chambers: they all show
the unmistakable signs of having died of
typhus, with the characteristic thinness
being caused by the dehydration which
accompanies that sickness. Although it
was initially claimed that there were gas
chambers in all the camps, it is now
claimed that the only gas chamber
victims were in the camps in German
occupied Poland.

Nazi-Zionist Alliance

The outbreak of the Second World War did not initially see an increase in the number of concentration camps, although their number had been steadily growing since 1933. However, the closing of the borders following the declaration of war meant that the steady flow of Jews out of German territory was cut off. Soon the German victories in Poland and in the West had added significantly to the total number of Jews under German territorial control.

Initially the Nazi plan with its Jews was open ended: vague projects had been started, all varying from proposing the resettlement of Jews in Rhodesia, Madagascar or Palestine. In this way one of the more remarkable alliances of the war was struck up between Reinhard Heydrich, the SS general who would later be assassinated in Prague, and German Jewish Zionists.

Heydrich, in co-operation with the Zionists, actually set up farms in Czechoslovakia for Jews wishing to emigrate to Palestine, to learn basic agricultural skills: several hundred of these Nazi-trained Jewish farmers were then settled in Palestine during the war, entering that land through Turkey.

However, all these plans were impractical while the war continued to rage: eventually a conference of top Nazi leaders was called in January 1942 at a villa in the suburb of Wannsee outside Berlin. Here the leadership of the Reich would decide what to do with the Jews under German control.


The Wannsee Conference

Although much has been made of the Wannsee conference and its detailed minutes, the record of the proceedings does not make particularly gripping reading: nowhere is it said that Jews were to be put to death, and only talks about interning Jews and resettling them in the protectorate of Poland to be used as laborers until the war was over, when another plan could be worked out.

Contemporary historians have taken the word "resettlement" as used in the Wannsee minutes to be a codeword for extermination - there is however no evidence to support this interpretation.


The Einsatzgruppen

In the interim, Germany had invaded the Soviet Union and had conquered huge areas of that country. The SS, entrusted with the political mission of the Nazi Party, formed what were called Einsatzgruppen - "Special Action Groups" to go in behind the German front-line with the specific instructions to execute, by shooting, all Communist functionaries, partisans or other "politically unreliable" elements behind the front-line.

The Einsatzgruppen carried out their task with Germanic efficiency, sending back regular reports to Berlin (which survived the war) detailing in specific detail how many people they had killed in each time period between reports. Due to the fact that a large number of Communist functionaries were Jews, this group made up a large number, but not always a majority, of the people eliminated by the Einsatzgruppen, who were always careful to specify exactly how many of who they had killed in each particular operation.

The battle with Communist partisans was sometimes particularly fierce: more than one Einsatzgruppen commander was killed in combat. Although a final tally of Einsatzgruppen victims has never been conclusively estimated, at least 200,000 people, and possibly more, were killed by the Einsatzgruppen before their efforts were abandoned in the wake of the German retreat from the occupied areas.


The Concentration Camps in Poland

In the part of Poland set up as German protectorate, called the Government General, six new concentration camps were built, with the first starting to function in late 1942, and the last being closed by August 1944.

The six camps became known by the towns to which they were nearest situated: Chelmno (also known as Kulmhof), Belzec, Sobibor, Treblinka, Majdanek (also known as Lublin), and Auschwitz.

A map showing the network of main Nazi concentration
camps. Although it was claimed after the war that all
the camps were used as mass murder centers, since
the mid 1960s it is claimed that only the camps in
Poland were used for mass homicides by gas. In fact,
even in the time when this map, extracted from a well
known History of the Holocaust, appeared in the early
1970s, the location of the "extermination camps"
changed once again - it will be noted that Stutthof (in
East Prussia) is shown as one of the "extermination
camps" - this allegation has long since been abandoned
and Stutthof is now classified along with the other
camps in the West as "only" a concentration camp.

The Wannsee conference had specifically stated that the camps were to be used as forced labor units - and indeed Auschwitz was one of the biggest industrial sites in all of Poland. Situated next to the concentration camp was a number of huge industrial complexes, all relying on concentration camp forced labor: these included Agfa, Bayer Pharmaceuticals and Siemens factories, as well as the famous Buna rubber plant, which produced much of Germany's supplies of rubber, and also which innovated the oil from coal process.

The new camps in Poland also differed substantially from the old camps in Germany itself in another way: the vast majority of prisoners were Jews who had been interned and deported from Germany and occupied Europe with trial. In this way the Polish Jewish doctor, Ludwik Flek was deported to Auschwitz where the SS put him to work in a laboratory manufacturing vaccines: Flek survived the war despite his incarceration in Auschwitz (Racial Hygiene, Medicine Under the Nazis, Robert N. Proctor, Harvard University Press. p. 283).


The Six Million

Despite the presence of massive industrial operations and the short time that the camps were in existence (less than two years all told) it is traditionally claimed that some six million Jews were killed in gas chambers at these six camps in Poland. (The other concentration camps in Germany itself, such as Dachau or Bergen Belsen, did not, it is claimed, have gas chambers).

There is however considerable confusion over the exact number of Jewish deaths in all the camps, and indeed a debate over whether gas chamber executions even took place on the scale so often alleged. The complete lack of German documentation on the issue has not helped: unlike the Einsatzgruppen, where at least a partial record was kept of all killings carried out, the Germans kept no records of any mass murders in any of the camps.

An increasing number of historian dissidents are challenging the claim of mass exterminations of Jews and others by the Nazis during World War Two, to the point where such revisionism has been declared illegal in many European countries. This in itself is cause to question the allegations, as truth should not need to be defended by law. However, an analysis of the claims and counter claims is outside of the scope and purpose of this book.


Jewish Persecution IN NAZI GERMANY

"Don't Buy from Jews"
reads this sign behind
a Nazi Stormtrooper
during one of many
boycotts of Jewish
businesses in Germany.

All the debate around the Holocaust and its impact upon Jews and Nazi Germany aside, no-one would question that the Jews, like everyone else in the Second World War, suffered great misfortune and were in particular subjected to unprecedented persecution and harassment on racial grounds.

International Jewry had however publicly and openly declared war on Nazi Germany, and the Nazis therefore regarded Jews as a hostile combatant group of special significance.

Jews were prohibited in many German towns completely and barred from many professions, including operating mail order businesses; from offering services at public markets; from taking orders for goods; or from holding "leadership" positions in German factories.

In 1938, they were forbidden from changing their names to "German sounding" ones: and later in that same year they were all compelled to add Sarah or Israel as a middle name to their original names (depending upon their sex) so as to distinguish them further. German Jews were prevented from attending public theaters and film shows in 1939: places were denied to them at universities and other places of learning; special taxes were imposed upon them and crude anti-Jewish propaganda was taught and encouraged at lower school level amongst school children. Finally, in November 1938, Jews were barred from attending German schools.

Then there was always the constant possibility of physical attack: the most serious widespread example of this came in 1938, after a Jew in Paris assassinated a German diplomat in that city: the following night Nazi stormtroopers attacked Jews, synagogues and Jewish owned shops all over Germany, killing dozens of Jews and leaving so much broken glass in the streets that the event became known as the Kristalnacht - the Night of Crystals.

Above-left: The assassination of German diplomat Ernst vom Rath sparked a week long anti-Jewish pogrom in Germany resulting the famous "Crystal Night" where the window fronts of Jewish shops across Germany were smashed. Above-Right: Herschel Grynszpan, the Jewish assassin of Ernst vom Rath in Paris, triggered the "Crystal Night" retaliation attacks on Jewish targets in Germany. Ironically, while in a French prison, Grynszpan fell into German hands in 1940 when France was occupied, but the Germans left him alone and he survived the war.

The German government was however reactive to public opinion. This was vividly illustrated when in 1943 a public demonstration by around 1,000 German women in central Berlin when their Jewish husbands and teenage sons had been arrested and were about to be deported to labor camps. Bowing to the display of public pressure, the German government released all 1,200 interned Jews and half-Jews: they were never subjected to any form of harassment again (Reuters, 09/09/98, Berlin honors 1943 protest against Holocaust). In September 1998, a plaque was erected in Berlin on the square where the protest took place.

All things said, to have been a Jew in Nazi Germany could not have been a pleasant experience: but, as the over 4.3 million claims against the post war German state from Jews who suffered as a result of this persecution, (by 1998 the German state had paid out over $50 billion in reparations), certainly far fewer died than what is most often claimed. Increasingly, all the evidence urges a complete revision of this aspect of the history of World War Two.

[Stefanus]

March of the Titans
A History Of The White Race

Chapter 65: The White Master Goes Home:
The Collapse of Colonialism

At the end of the Second World War, the White countries in Europe were physically and psychologically weakened: the balance of power passed firmly to the United States on the one hand and the Soviet Union the other. These factors, combined with a resurgence in non-White nationalisms in the colonies, led directly to the post-war wave of decolonization.

British Decolonization

As the holder of the largest number of colonies, Britain had the hardest task of all the White nations to try and get rid of its possessions in the most dignified manner possible. This was not always possible, particularly in the light of the emergence of many violent non-White liberation movements after the Second World War: more often than not, funded or supplied by the Soviet Union which saw the decolonization process as a way of striking at the capitalist West whilst at the same time creating firm allies in the Third World.

Nonetheless, the first step had to be taken: the Labour Party government in Britain which had replaced Winston Churchill's government at the first election after the war, formally acknowledged that the era of the Empire was over. It then started the post war decolonization drive by granting independence to India and Pakistan in 1947 and to Burma and Ceylon (Sri Lanka) in 1948.

The King David Hotel, Jerusalem, 1946:
blown up in a bomb attack by Zionists,
some 90 people, including senior British
personnel, were killed in the attack.

ZIONIST TERROR CAMPAIGN AGAINST BRITISH AND ARABS IN PALESTINE

In 1948, after a protracted guerrilla war waged by Jewish nationalists in Palestine - which saw many British soldiers killed during several notable terrorist incidents, including the blowing up the King David Hotel in Jerusalem and several massacres of Arabs (the most famous being at Deir Yassin, carried out by the Stern Gang, a branch of the Jewish nationalist guerrillas known collectively as the Irgun, led by one Menachem Begin, later a prime minister of Israel) Britain finally made good its 1917 Balfour Declaration promise and granted independence to Palestine, letting the United Nations divide it up between Arabs and Jews.

This displacement of large numbers of Palestinian Arabs has been the single greatest cause of conflict in the Middle East since then, sparking of a number of full-scale wars and a long running Arab-Palestinian conflict which regularly flares up into open warfare.

In 1956, growing nationalism in Egypt saw that country seize the Suez canal from the British: a combined French and British invasion of the Suez Canal region coincided with an Arab-Israeli war - although the mission ended in failure after the Soviet Union threatened intervention.


BLACK ANTI-WHITE TERROR IN KENYA AND THE CONGO

So it was that in the 1950's, extreme anti-White terrorist movements sprang up in numerous colonies in Africa, the most prominent being in Kenya (where the Mau-Mau terrorists created a reign of terror, attacking White settlements and their livestock) and in the Congo, where the atrocities committed against White settlements reached their most extreme. It was in the Congo that hundreds of Whites were killed by Black uprisings, many being mutilated in the most brutal fashion, with Christian missionaries most often being the targets of attack.


BRITISH WITHDRAW FROM Egypt, Sudan and Cyprus

In 1952, the last of British puppet kings of Egypt was overthrown in a coup organized by Egyptian army officers, and in that year the country was declared a republic. This was followed two years later by the British granting the Sudan independence. In 1960, Britain gave formal independence to Cyprus: this state would last until 1974, when it would become a battleground between Turkey and Greece, and eventually be divided between those two nations.


THE "Winds of Change" SWEEP THROUGH AFRICA

Anti-White riots took place in Accra, the Gold Coast, in February 1948: the British granted it independence under the name Ghana in 1957: Guinea followed in 1958 and in 1960 alone 17 African states were granted independence. By the end of the 1970s, almost all of Africa was independent. These countries included Nigeria (1960), Sierra Leone (1961), Tanganyika (1961, later Tanzania), Uganda (1962), Kenya (1963), Zambia (1964), Malawi (1964), The Gambia (1965), Botswana (1966), and Swaziland (1968).

The White Empress has fallen:
A Black child looks at the
overturned statue of Queen
Victoria in Guinea, shortly after
that colony had become
independent in 1958.

Only in Southern Rhodesia, was a hiccup experienced when White settlers refused to accept Black rule and declared their independence, holding out as a pariah state for 17 years before finally conceding to Black majority rule.


WEST INDIAN ISLANDS GAIN INDEPENDENCE

The islands of Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago became independent in 1962, with most of the other islands in the region following suit at intervals. Ironically, these island states originally had no indigenous Black population at all, and were the product of the Trans-Atlantic slave trade.


Portuguese Decolonization follows anti-guerilla wars in Angola and Mozambique

Portugal held on to its African colonies the longest, ending up fighting a vicious war with the locals in both Angola and Mozambique. However, a change of government in Portugal itself in 1974 saw the Portuguese dump their colonies overnight: the very opposite of the dignified British departures, not that it made much difference to the state of the respective colonies. In addition to Angola and Mozambique, the other two remaining Portuguese possessions which became independent in 1974, were Cape Verde and Guinea-Bissau.

A scene which was to repeat itself
all over Africa during the time of
decolonization and afterwards:
Kiyuku tribesmen in the Congo lie
dead, massacred by neighboring
tribesmen. Many White colonists
unfortunate enough to be caught
up in these conflicts were also
massacred.

Spain abandons last colony in Africa

In 1976, following the death of Spanish dictator Franco, Spain gave up the territory known as Spanish Sahara, which then was divided between Mauritania and Morocco.


Dutch Decolonization

The Dutch colony of Surinam, situated in South America, became a self-governing part of the Netherlands in 1954, and was granted full independence in 1975. The first years of independence were marked by a mass exodus of 40,000 Surinames legally leaving their country and settling in the Netherlands: they were followed by possibly an equal number of illegal immigrants, and the flow has not stopped as Surinam continued to decline into Third World anarchy.


French Decolonization follows Granting of French citizenship to millions of Blacks

In 1956, France granted independence to Morocco and Tunisia, while in French sub-Saharan Africa, an effort had been made to stave off nationalist movements by granting the inhabitants of the Black colonies full status as citizens and by allowing deputies and senators from each territory to sit in the French National Assembly.

These concessions - which all had racial implications for France as they led to a large influx of Black Africans - were however for the greatest part insufficient to satisfy the demands for full independence. France relinquished the Comoro Islands in 1975, and Djibouti was granted independence in 1977.


De Gaulle orders French withdrawal from Algeria, betrays White colonists

Nearly a million White French people had settled in the colony of Algeria by the late 1950s: they had however been forced to fight a long-running war against Algerian non-White nationalists for control of the country. The French leader of the time, Charles de Gaulle, then set in motion a policy of granting independence to all French colonies, including Algeria with its large White population.

The resentment of the White colonists at being left to the mercies of the Algerians, who had committed many frightful atrocities against the White French settlers - boiled over into the resistance movement known as the Organisation d'Armee Secrete (OAS, or Secret Army Organization) which was comprised of mainly French soldiers who had fought the Algerians. The OAS launched a campaign of violence against the French government figures who were instrumental in the process of granting Algeria independence. The OAS also tried at least once to kill De Gaulle as well, but the organization fell apart after most of the leaders were captured or killed.


Massacre of White settlers in Algiers

A protest by thousands of White French settlers in Algiers on 7 April 1962, ended when French Arab troops opened fire with live ammunition: some 50 White men, women and children were killed in the street. After this massacre, the handover process was quickly concluded: the non-White Algerian nationalists managed to kill another 3,000 French White settlers before the vast majority - nearly a million - left for France, stripping the country virtually overnight of its First World population and plunging it instantly into Third World status.

The massacre of White French civilians on the streets
of Algiers by Arab soldiers on 7 April 1962. Fifty Whites
were gunned down during a protest rally.

ALGERIANS FLOOD INTO FRANCE

Algeria has however come back to haunt France: millions of North Africans have settled in France, bringing with them a mix of militant Islam and ethnic conflict which spills over from Algeria in ever increasing waves. The full implications of this and other developments are discussed in the last chapter of this book.


FRENCH WITHDRAWAL FROM SOUTH EAST ASIA MARKS START OF VIETNAM WAR

France's colonies in Asia were obliterated by the Japanese occupation of French Indo-China during the Second World War. When France bucked the decolonization trend and tried to re-establish its mastery over Vietnam, a war with the natives broke out. The French fought the Vietnamese in a major regionalized race war from 1946 to 1954, but were then dealt a severe defeat by the Vietnamese leader Ho Chi Min at the Battle of Dien Bien Phu. The French then withdrew, leaving the Americans to become entangled in a hot war with Communist backed guerrillas which would turn into the Vietnam War.


NON-WHITE INFLUX INTO EUROPE - DIRECT Consequence of Decolonization

For all the White countries which engaged in decolonization, the most immediate consequence has been the influx of a large number of former colonized peoples into the former colonizers' homelands: all across Europe there are millions of Africans and Asians who have been drawn to the continent purely because of the ex-colonial link. The full consequences of this are discussed in the last chapter of this book.

[Stefanus]

March of the Titans
A History Of The White Race

Chapter 66: Social Upheaval -
'Civil Rights' and the Collapse of Communism

Part One: Black Power: The Civil Rights Movement

The forty five years following the end of the Second World War were dominated by three issues: the decolonization process; the development of the concept of Civil Rights, which saw the last of the formal segregation measures between Black and White, mainly in America, come tumbling down; and the hostility between the 'West" and the "East" - also known as the Cold War, or conflict between Communism and the West.

In all of these developments, race was to play a critical factor: the decolonization process has already been dealt with; in the Cold War conflict the Soviets and the West fought each other through non-White surrogates in the Third World; and the Civil Rights movement in America produced some of the greatest racial clashes in America's history, essentially without solving the issues at hand.


The Emergence of Racial National Politics in America

Although it is often claimed that there are no racial patterns discernible in American politics, in fact there have been very clear racial divides since the presidency of Franklin Roosevelt : in the mid 1930s, the majority of Blacks voted for the Democratic Party for the first time, and have maintained that loyalty to the greater degree.

Right to the end of the 20th century, the majority of Blacks have tended to vote for the Democratic Party, which along with the growing Mexican (called Hispanic) vote, has become the chosen party of non-White Americans, as opposed to the Republicans who have to increasingly rely more and more on shrinking numbers of White voters.

The first time that the black bloc vote played a significant role in helping to elect an American president occurred as early as 1948, when Harry Truman was elected to the office through a combination of the bloc Black vote and a minority of White votes. Truman had gained the support of Blacks by issuing an executive order that eventually desegregated the armed forces and by supporting a pro-civil rights policy for the Democratic Party over strong opposition from Southerners. The next president, Dwight D. Eisenhower, completed the desegregation of the government and armed forces, but refused to take it any further than that.


NAACP EVOLVES UNDER JEWISH LEADERSHIP

Blacks, led by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP - despite its name, the NAACP was ironically led by Arthur Spingarn, a Jewish lawyer, who became the focus for much anti-Semitic propaganda from the American right wing) turned to the courts.

One of the earliest NAACP legal victories was the 1944 outlawing of the all-White Democratic Party primary, an institution which had existed since the post reconstruction period in America. In May 1954, the NAACP won a ruling from the US Supreme Court, known as the case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, in terms of which racial segregation was outlawed in all American public schools.

This decision reversed the principle of "separate but equal" that had been the basis of black-white relations since the Plessy v. Ferguson decision of 1896. Subsequent decisions in 1955 and 1956, compelled local governments to publicly announce plans for desegregation and also ended racial segregation in intrastate transportation.


FORCED Integration at Gunpoint

Whites in the Southern states bitterly opposed the moves to desegregate schools. In September 1957, the governor of Arkansas, Orval E. Faubus, ordered the state's National Guard to prevent nine Black students from attending Central High School in Little Rock.

On 23 September, following a number of racial clashes between Blacks and Whites in the town, Eisenhower dispatched federal troops to force White students to attend the school, frog-marching the protesting Whites at gunpoint with bayonets drawn, into the classrooms.

Racial integration at gun point: White pupils are forced at gun
point with bayonets drawn to attend the racially integrated
high school at Little Rock, Arkansas, USA, September 1957.

Public Transport DESEGREGATED

By December 1955, a series of public protests led by the Black Christian minister Martin Luther King, had succeeded in forcing the desegregation of public transport in the South, most notably in Montgomery, Alabama, where a sit-in in a bus terminal created such chaos that the state government was forced to back down on its segregationist policies.


The Northern States and Bussing

Although the northern states of America did not have as extensive a network of segregationist laws as the southern states, the reality was that the races lived in separate neighborhoods for the greatest part and thus also had segregated schools and facilities.

Where intentional segregation existed in the north, as in the city of Boston, the federal courts ordered redrawing of neighborhood school district lines, starting the practice of "bussing" - where children of different races were transported, sometimes 80 kilometers - 50 miles or more - across huge distances to force them to attend schools attended predominantly by other races. This bussing system caused a great many racial clashes and violence.

High School students at Fairdale High, Jefferson
county, KY, show their opinion of bussing. The
forced integration policies, only abandoned in
the 1980s, sparked off the greatest period of
racial violence the USA had seen to that time.

Very little point was achieved by sending 100 White children into a school of 2000 Black children, or vice versa, apart from increasing racial tensions dramatically. The practice of bussing then spread all over America, soon becoming a major national political issue which was debated right up to presidential level.


Kennedy and Civil Rights

The 1960 election of John F. Kennedy as Democratic Party president of America - again with overwhelming Black voter support - saw a new surge in laws designed to strike down the last of the segregationist measures in America.


Miscegenation Laws Repealed

The long established American laws forbidding intermarriage between Whites and Blacks were also then challenged in courts and repealed: between 1942 and 1967, 14 states repealed their anti-miscegenation laws. In the case known as Loving v. Virginia (1967), the US Supreme Court struck down laws banning interracial marriage and by 1968, all forms of de jure segregation had been declared unconstitutional.


University Race Riots

A major racial incident occurred in 1962, when a Black student attempted to register at the University of Mississippi: a protest by White students was met with a counter demonstration by Blacks and soon a full-scale race riot erupted, in which two people were killed and 375 wounded. The Mississippi National Guard had to be called in to patrol the university campus. President Kennedy also sent federal troops onto the campus of the university of Alabama to enforce integration at gunpoint there as well.

Kennedy was on the point of preparing a comprehensive law to enforce Black rights when he was assassinated in Dallas, Texas in 1963. His successor, vice president Lyndon B. Johnson, immediately announced that he would proceed with all due haste to enact the legislation that Kennedy had started: the result was a July 1963 law, which prohibited discrimination in the use of federal funds and in public accommodations; at the same time an "Equal Employment Opportunity Commission" was set up to ensure that Whites employed equal numbers of Blacks in any businesses they had - the start of the racial quota system which in effect meant anti-White discrimination, forcing businesses to employ non-Whites even if better qualified White candidates were available.


Voting Rights Act of 1965

In addition to this, the US Constitution was amended in January 1964, to prevent any local authority from using poll tax registration as a means of preventing any person from registering as a voter. Finally in 1965, a comprehensive Civil Rights Act, more correctly called the Voting Rights Act, was signed into law by Johnson: this gave legislative enforcement to the constitutional amendment.

The law also suspended (and amendments later banned) the use of literacy tests for voters. The final abolition of the last literacy tests allowed high numbers of illiterate Black to gain access to the vote: in Mississippi, for example, the percentage of Blacks registered to vote increased from 7 percent in 1964 to 59 percent in 1968.


Black Riots ERUPT DESPITE SOCIAL CHANGES

Despite the pace of change, many Blacks found no improvement in their immediate quality of life or standard of living, and dismissed as racist White explanations that it had taken decades, if not centuries, for the White American population to reach the standards it had. Although Black and White racial violence had long been a feature of the civil rights movement, specifically Black riots started in the 1960s.

The first serious disturbances broke out in Cambridge in 1963 and 1964, and the National Guard was called in to restore order. Then in 1965, a particularly severe Black riot erupted in Watts, a Black ghetto in Los Angeles. The Watts riots lasted six days, taking 34 lives and causing $40 million in property damage.

An American army patrol in Watts, Los Angeles, USA, after Black riots virtually destroyed that suburb in the 1965 riot.

Black riots then spread across more than 30 major American cities, turning almost every major center into a battle zone of White policemen trying to control mobs of Blacks rioting and burning and looting anything they could. It was from these Black riots that the 1960s phrase "Burn, Baby Burn" was developed. From 1964 to 1968, Black riots had killed 215 people and caused $250 million damage.


Kerner Commission: "Separate and Unequal"

Baffled by the Black riots - in theory there should have been less reason to riot than ever before, what with the desegregation laws and pro-non-White discrimination racial quotas having both come into effect - president Johnson appointed a commission, headed by the former governor of Illinois, Otto Kerner, to investigate the causes of Black unrest.

Above: Two typical street scenes from the Watts Riots, 1965: Blacks take the opportunity to loot shops, under the excuse of "racism."

The report of the Kerner Commission, issued in 1968, warned of the increasing racial polarization in the United States and said that the "nation is moving toward two societies, one white, one black - separate and unequal."

No sooner had this warning been made, but a fresh wave of riots broke out in April 1968 when Martin Luther King was assassinated by a White man in Tennessee. Once again federal troops had to be called out to suppress the anarchy.


The Bakke Case PROHIBITS RACIAL QUOTAS

The system of racial quotas for educational and private institutions was struck a serious blow by a 1978 US Supreme Court case. In that case, known as Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, the University of California was prohibited from creating racial quotas, but was permitted to consider race as one factor in admissions policies. The Court later ruled that racial preferences by a private corporation designed to remedy prior discrimination did not violate the Civil Rights Act, and it upheld a federal statute that requires a certain percentage of government contracts to be given to non-White businesses.


US CITIES FACE White Flight

Increasing Black urbanization, coupled with its associated problems of an increased crime-rate, increased racial tensions and resultant integrated schools - which in every measured case led to fall in educational standards - created in the 1970s the phenomena of "White flight". Entire neighborhoods of Whites started moving, lock stock and barrel, out of the major American cities into outlying suburbs. In this way many city centers became almost overnight Blacks-only areas: and this, combined with the dropping of any type of voter qualification, meant that by the mid-1970s, a number of these major cities had elected Black mayors and city councils for the first time.


Bussing in Boston FORCES WHITES TO LEAVE

In June 1974, a federal court ruled that the Boston School Committee had deliberately maintained racial segregation in the city's public schools and ordered the implementation of bussing programs to bring children to schools outside their own neighborhoods. This led to serious racial clashes between Black and White pupils and their parents, and in 1975, a new integration program was ordered, which saw a staggering 21,000 pupils of different races bussed all over the city in an attempt to achieve some type of racial balance in the state schools.

An anti-bussing demonstration by angry Whites in
front of Boston's City Hall. Despite a groundswell
opposition to bussing and forced integration, the
politicians persisted with this policy, eventually
forcing many Whites out of the cities, creating the
phenomena known as "White Flight."

This caused a huge number of Whites to leave the inner city areas of Boston, adding to the White flight syndrome already taking form in most other American cities. All-White private schools also then started springing up like mushrooms.


Black Riots Erupt in Los Angeles

One of the worst Black riots in American history took place in Los Angeles in April 1992, after four White policemen were acquitted in the assault of a Black motorist (who had a long criminal record), Rodney King. The assault on King was captured on video - but the policemen were acquitted after the entire video was shown: a 13 second prelude to the assault - which was not widely shown to the public - showed King resisting arrest and assaulting the White police officers.

Blacks in Los Angeles and elsewhere, immediately forming a racial solidarity (which, if done by Whites, would be called "racist") with the victim of the assault, went on the rampage: fifty-eight people died in the rioting, and property damage exceeded $750 million.


CALIFORNIA : Proposition 187 AIMED AT REDUCING ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION

By the 1990s, illegal Mexican immigration into California had reached floodgate proportions and was placing a massive strain on that state's resources. In November 1994, California voters approved a law, called Proposition 187, which revoked the rights of illegal immigrants to state education, welfare, and health services.

In November 1995, a U.S. District judge overturned major parts of the proposition, but many of its basic points remained in force. California has always been the focal point for immigration into America: during the 1970s, attempts by that state's educational authorities to enforce racial quotas (which saw non-Whites being given places ahead of better qualified White students purely on the basis of race) on the University of California were overturned by the 1974 Bakke decision.

In July 1995, however, the University of California Board of Regents turned away from previous admissions policies entirely when it passed a resolution eliminating programs that called for pro-non-White discrimination in admissions, hiring, and the granting of outside contracts.

In November 1996, California voters then passed the California Civil Rights Initiative, also known as Proposition 209, which ended any pro-non-White discrimination based on race or ethnicity for jobs, state contracts, or admission to state schools. However, its implementation was prevented by various court challenges


Civil Rights IN REVIEW: A COLOSSAL Failure

In real terms, the decades of civil rights programs have been a failure. Not only have average living standards for all but an elite of Blacks declined, but they have also dropped on every other social indicator.

In 1997, over one million Black American men were in prison, and homicide was the leading cause of death among Black men aged 15 to 34. Nationwide, blacks -- although only 12 per cent of the population -- account for 64 per cent of all violent-crime arrests and 71 per cent of all robbery arrests. ("Paved With Good Intentions: The Failure of Race Relations in Contemporary America" Jared Taylor, Carroll & Graf, 1993).

In 1988, there were fewer than ten cases of white-on-black rape -- as opposed to 9,405 cases of black-on-white rape. Taylor reports that black men appear three to four times more likely to commit rape than whites, and more than sixty times more likely to rape a white than a white is likely to rape a black. (Taylor, ibid)

This black crisis still disproportionately hurts whites. Black criminals choose white victims in more than half of their violent crime; the average black criminal seems over 12 times more likely to kill a white than vice versa.

Homicide is now the leading cause of death for black men between 15 and 44; one in four black men in their twenties is either in jail, on probation, or on parole. Syphilis is fifty times more prevalent among blacks than among whites; black children are twice as likely as whites to die in their first year. (Taylor, ibid)

A far greater percentage of Blacks than Whites are officially classed as being below the poverty line; drug addiction and criminality amongst the American Black population is proportionately dramatically higher than it is for any other segment of the American population.

All this has happened despite the USA subsidizing its Black poor, publicly and privately, to the tune of more than $2.5 trillion in federal moneys alone since the 1960s.

The cities run by Black Americans - Washington DC, Detroit and others - are marked by collapse, decay, exceedingly high levels of violent crime, drugs, gang wars and economic decline. The American Dream has for the most part remained beyond the reach of Black America, despite massive help and subsidies to help it along the way.

The words of the 1968 Kerner Report have remained as valid as ever: America is a society of racially separate unequals.

[Stefanus]

March of the Titans
A History Of The White Race

Chapter 66: Social Upheaval -
'Civil Rights' and the Collapse of Communism

Part Two: The Cold War and the Soviet Union's Collapse

It had become apparent to Britain and America before the end of the Second World War that the Soviet Union had no intention of sticking to earlier pledges to install democratic governments in the territories it had occupied in Eastern Europe as a result of the collapse of the Nazi state.

These suspicions were confirmed when one-party systems were instituted in all the eastern European countries directly under Soviet control, and the basic principles of Marxism were implemented to the letter: private property was for the greatest part outlawed and all market institutions became state controlled.


The Berlin Blockade

The division of Germany between the Soviets and the Western democratic powers became the focal point of the conflict which was to erupt between these two ideological systems: the erection of the wall around the divided city of Berlin and the erection of fortifications along the borders of all Communist controlled countries facing onto the West, became symbols of the post war divide.

Eventually, rising tensions led to the Soviets attempting to drive the Allied powers out of Berlin by closing all road and rail access to the Western-controlled part of the city, which was deep inside Communist-controlled territory. The West responded by supplying the city by air in a round the clock operation which became known as the Berlin airlift. In many ways, Berlin symbolized what happened to the entire Eastern Europe after the end of the war: under a totalitarian dictatorship with full state control of all aspects of life, a long line of walls and fortifications were built to cut off these countries from all contact with the west.

The wall built in Berlin, sometimes cutting through buildings and dividing streets in half, symbolized the division. The erection of the physical divisions along the borders of East Germany, Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia and around West Berlin led the British wartime leader, Winston Churchill, to make his famous remark that during the war the Allies had "slaughtered the wrong pig".

Germans throw rocks at Soviet tanks
in the streets of Berlin, 1953.

The Cold War PHYSICALLY DIVIDES EUROPE

While democratic governments were restored in almost all of Western Europe (except in Spain and Portugal). Eastern Europe was plunged into a protracted period of one-party rule which involved the suppression of all dissidents. Even the Allied controlled part of Germany was eventually given self rule under a democratic government (with the only restriction on political activity in Germany being on parties which supported, or were deemed by the state to support, National Socialism - an exclusion which is still in force) and thus the basis was laid for a 50-year standoff which became known as the Cold War between the Communist Soviet Empire and the Capitalist democratic West under the leadership of the United States.


NATO and the Warsaw Pact SQUARE UP

In April 1949, the United States, Canada, and ten Western European nations arranged a guarantee of mutual defense and assistance in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, known as NATO. In response to this, the Soviet Union banded its Eastern European satellites together into an organization which became known as the Warsaw Pact in 1955: this Pact would only last as long as the Soviet Union itself, and folded early in the 1990s.


ANTI-COMMUNIST REBELLIONS ERUPT in Eastern Europe

The Communists did not have a completely free ride in establishing their dictatorships in the Eastern European countries: there were violent uprisings against Soviet rule in East Germany in 1953; and in Poland and Hungary in 1956 (the latter two uprisings were marked by a strong anti-Jewish outburst, in reaction to the large number of Jews in the Communist administrations). Also in 1968, a largely peaceful rebellion took place in Czechoslovakia, known as the Prague Spring: these uprisings were put down with brute force, and did not re-occur while the Soviet Empire still held together.

The body of a Hungarian communist
secret policeman lies in the streets
of Budapest, 1956, after having been
lynched by a mob during the anti-
Communist uprising of that year. All
the uprisings in Eastern Europe were
suppressed by Soviet armed might.

Conflict in the Third World

Despite much posturing and many threatening actions undertaken by both sides over the next fifty years, the much-feared Third World War between the Soviets and the United States never came about. Although the Soviet Union and America themselves never actually came to trading blows, their proxies throughout the world did: in Korea (1953); in Vietnam (1967); in Latin America (over a large number of years) and in Africa (also over a large number of years).


The Korean War

In June 1950, when South Korea was invaded by the forces of Communist North Korea, the Americans announced that they would intervene to assist the South Koreans. In November 1950, the Chinese Communists officially entered the war, and a hot war between an American led United Nations task force and the Red Chinese then followed.

The war ended in 1953, with North and South Korea's borders returning to their original jump-off positions: by the end of the 20th century this Korean division had still not been solved.

A Soviet ship, photographed from
an American spy plane, carrying
Soviet aircraft to Cuba, 1962.

Cuban Missile Crisis BRINGS WORLD TO BRINK OF NUCLEAR WAR

In 1962, the much feared clash between the USA and the USSR did almost take place: when the Soviets provided Cuban bases with offensive missiles, the American president John Kennedy demanded their withdrawal. After a highly tension-packed standoff which saw both sides ready for armed conflict, the Soviets yielded and withdrew the missiles.


Vietnam WAR ENDS IN AMERICAN DISASTER

The origin of the Vietnam conflict lay in the division of that country between Communist Vietnamese in the North and Nationalist Vietnamese in the South of that country: once again the competing sides had the support of the Communists - this time the Chinese - and the United States respectively. In 1956, the South declared itself an independent republic: in retaliation, the North organized an army, the Vietcong, to start a guerrilla war against the South. By 1965, the South Vietnamese had appealed for, and received, direct military aid from America: by 1968, the United States had sent in a huge army 550,000 strong - with a significant number being Black troops.

Despite an overwhelming material advantage and massive saturation bombing of North Vietnam, the American troops were unable to make any major headway against the Vietcong. Military discipline began to decline, with sections of the American army - Black and White - becoming famous for their open drug abuse and other reprehensible behavior.

A famous picture which came to symbolize
American defeat in Vietnam: the last
helicopter leaves the roof of the American
Embassy in Saigon, April 1975.

Ultimately, the presence of American troops and the use of napalm bombing and other weapons turned a majority of Vietnamese against the foreigners and the South: when the American troops withdrew in 1973. They had to all intents been beaten, the first war to be lost by America. The North Vietnamese captured all of the South in 1975.


African STATES USED AS FRONTS

In Africa the Communists once again had considerably more success than the Americans in creating allies. Openly and massively supporting (with arms and troops) all the anti-colonial Black liberation movements, the Soviets managed to outsmart the Americans time and time again with an aggressive foreign policy which saw great swathes of that continent fall under Soviet influence.

The Soviets also played a major racial card by supporting the Black liberation movements in South Africa and Rhodesia. This included the use of tens of thousands of Cuban troops in Angola to ward off South African incursions into that country during the 1970s and 1980s.

Although the Americans covertly helped some anti-Communist Black guerrillas in Angola, using the South Africans as a supply line, they refused to aid South Africa or Rhodesia itself, not wanting to associate itself with the two White governments.


SOVIET INVASION OF Afghanistan, 1979, BECOMES RUSSIA'S VIETNAM

In 1979, the Soviets invaded Afghanistan and started a major racial clash in the region: the Soviets were forced to deploy only White Russian troops after it discovered that its Mongol and other troops from the non-White regions of the Soviet Union started defecting to the Muslim Afghan resistance - which, unsurprisingly, was supplied by the United States through Pakistan and India.

The war in Afghanistan proved highly costly and unpopular in the Soviet Union itself and eventually the Soviets withdrew, leaving the country embroiled in its own civil war. It was this invasion which would precipitate the fall of the Soviet Union: the inability of the Soviet Army to rely on any but its White Russian troops in the conflict exposed the searing racial and ethnic divisions which would later give rise to the breakup of the Soviet Union.

The Soviet Empire at its strongest:
a May Day parade, Moscow, 1982.

The Fall of the Soviet Empire

When the Communist Party chose Mikhail Gorbachev as its new leader in 1985, it had little idea of what he would do: he immediately launched a campaign aimed at transforming Soviet society, called perestroika ("restructuring") and glasnost' ("openness"). This included political reforms: by 1989, other candidates apart from Communist Party endorsed ones, were allowed to participate in elections for the Supreme Soviet parliament.

Gorbachev withdrew Soviet troops from Afghanistan and signed agreements with American president George Bush to end production of chemical weapons and make substantial cuts in nuclear weapons. Finally in 1990, the Soviet Communist Party surrendered its hold on total power which Trotsky had taken in 1918, and allowed other political parties the freedom to operate.

Ukrainian nationalists demonstrate
in Kiev, holding a symbolically red
paint splattered picture of Lenin.
The Ukraine was to achieve its aim
of independence upon the break-up
of the Soviet Union.

Communist Eastern Europe Falls

The Soviet Union then also refused to intervene in a wave of reforms which swept through Eastern Europe: the Communist governments in Poland, Hungary, and Czechoslovakia were ousted; Communist East Germany dissolved and became part of the Federal Republic of Germany. Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia also became independent in this wave of liberation from direct Soviet control.

However, many of the former Communist governments managed to adapt, and by changing their parties' names and exploiting the real problems in converting from state socialism to free market enterprise, in many cases managed to stay in power.


Communist Counter Coup ATTEMPTED IN RUSSIA

A desperate attempt by Communist hard-liners in 1991 to launch a coup against Gorbachev and his reforms failed, and pro-reformers under the former Communist Boris Yeltsin emerged as the new government of the day.

On December 21, 1991, the USSR formally ceased to exist, splitting up into 11 distinct ethnic and racially separate units: - Armenia, Azerbaijan, Byelorussia (renamed Belarus), Kazakhstan, Kirghiziya (renamed Kyrgyzstan), Moldavia (renamed Moldova), Russia, Tadzhikistan (renamed Tajikistan), Turkmenia (renamed Turkmenistan), Ukraine, and Uzbekistan. They all agreed to form the loosely defined Commonwealth of Independent States.

Gorbachev resigned on 25 December 1991 and the Soviet parliament acknowledged the dissolution of the USSR on 26 December 1991.

Above left: Soviet army tanks in Moscow during the attempted Communist counter coup against the reform process initiated by Mikhail Gorbachev, 1991. The coup failed due to indecisive leadership on the part of the plotters and a strong popular resistance led by recently elected Russian Republic president Boris Yeltsin. Above right: The last Soviet parliament meets, 26 December 1991, to vote itself out of existence. It was a fait accompli - hence almost none of the delegates even bothered to attend, as visible in this photograph. Above: Yeltsin acknowledges the cheers of a crowd after the suppression of the 1991 Communist counter coup: he went on to serve two terms as president the newly formed Russian Federation.

This breakup did not all go peacefully: in December 1994, Russian troops invaded the republic of Chechnya in southern Russia, which had declared its independence from the Russian Federation in November 1991. After a devastating war which killed more than 30,000 people, the war ended in a Russian withdrawal in March 1996.


Economic Hardship FOLLOWS COMMUNIST COLLAPSE

The history of Russia since the fall of the USSR has been one of extreme economic hardship, coupled with the creation of an elite of extremely rich-capitalists who were able to exploit the sudden privatization of much of the state by buying up many enterprises at rock-bottom prices.

A Russian army vehicle outside the Russian
parliament, burning after a furious gun fight
involving Russian troops loyal to the
government and a collection of Communist
and nationalist hard-liners inside the building.

A disproportionately large number of the new elite in Russia were Jewish: something which caused yet another resurgence in support for anti-Jewish parties in the country, most notably in the strangely named, but overtly anti-Jewish, Liberal Democratic Party, which won nearly 20 per cent of the popular vote in elections in the mid 1990s.

The economic hardship of Russia in the 1990s also created an increase in support for the once discredited Communist Party: it became once again one of the largest parties in the Russian parliament.


HARDLINE Russian Rebellion, 1993

In addition to these developments, Russia has also been rocked by political instability, with the most dramatic scenes occurring in 1993 when Yeltsin dismissed the parliament after it refused to give in to certain of his decrees: hard-liners holed themselves up inside the parliament building, only being forced to surrender when Russian tanks and soldiers opened fire on the building, provoking a furious gunfight.


Russia's Large White Population

Despite these problems, the population of the territories known as the USSR at the time of its dissolution was some 250 million - of this number, fully 190 million are racially classifiable as White, making Western Russia and the new states situated to the east of Poland and to the west of the Ural mountains, one of the largest concentration of Whites anywhere on the planet.

[Stefanus]

March of the Titans
A History Of The White Race

Chapter 67: The Changing Face:
Non-White Immigration into the White Heartlands

The dominating theme of European history in the last quarter of the 20th Century has been the large scale immigration of non-White peoples and races into the modern era White heartlands of Europe, Australia/New Zealand and North America.

This process has taken place via two avenues: legal immigration and illegal immigration: it is difficult to formulate estimates on which has been the greater. Whatever the channel used, the reality of masses of non-Whites settling in these territories can quite rightly said to be changing the face of these continents.

EUROPE

According to Eurostat (the Statistical Office of the European Communities, B-19049 Bruxelles, rue de la Loi 200, Luxembourg), in their publication, Migration Statistics, 1996, there is not one of the 15 countries in Western Europe (their area of measurement) which, at the beginning of 1994, did not have less than 3 -10 per cent of what they euphemistically call "non-nationals resident".

France, Germany, Austria, the Benelux countries, Denmark, Scandinavia and England are all listed as having "non-nationals resident" of more than 10 per cent, with Germany in two regions registered figures of "more than 15 per cent."

An average of between 10 and 15 per cent of "non nationals resident" in Western Europe as of the mid 1990's is therefore an accurate estimate, given that official figures are always behind actual statistics, as the number of illegal immigrants always closely shadows the number of legal immigrants.

By 1994, most European Union member states had an average 10 - 15 per cent non-White population, with this figure effectively doubling every fifteen years. This will mean that, unless current immigration trends are halted, all of Western Europe will have a non-White majority population by the year 2090 at the latest, and possibly earlier. These statistics are from the EU's own official records, Eurostat, in Belgium.

"Non-Nationals Resident" and "Less Developed Countries" are EU Code words

North African and Middle Eastern origin illegal immigrants,
arrested on a boat in the Mediterranean, heading for the
Spanish border.

These "non-nationals resident" are, according to the Eurostat figures, in the majority derived from that the "less developed countries" which are officially listed as: "Turkey, Africa, Latin America (excluding America and Canada); Asia (excluding Japan); Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand." (Migration Statistics, 1996, Eurostat, page xvii). It is clear that the terms "Non-Nationals Resident" and "Less Developed Countries" are therefore code words for non-White.


Non-white Majority IN EUROPE by 2090

If it is calculated that non-White immigration into Europe first started in significant numbers during the late 1950's and speeded up considerably during from the 1970's, it can be seen that the exponential growth rate means that the non-White population of Western Europe is successfully doubling approximately every fifteen years. This rate of growth, left unchecked, means that Europe will have an outright non-White majority population by the second half of the 21st century - by the year 2090.


France - NORTH AFRICAN IMMIGRATION FAVORITE

The largest source of non-Whites into France has come from North Africa: it is estimated that 6.95 million legally present non-White immigrants in France (of the total estimated 12 million non-Whites population of that country) originate from just three countries: Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia.

1946 100,000 1954 250,000 1962 400,000 1968 800,000 1975 2.4 million 1982 1.5 million 1990 1.4 million Total (in 1990) 6.95 million A table showing the number of North African immigrants entering France each year, and their increase since the end of the Second World War. (Source: BBC News website www.bbc.co.uk, 13 March 1998, "France Tops Europe Racist Poll")

These figures do not take into account illegal immigration. It is not surprising that immigration and race relations have become important issues in France in the 1990s. High unemployment and violence mark the Black and North African communities in France and have provoked serious emergencies in the Parisian capital.


Racial Mixing HIGH IN FRANCE

As in other European countries, the numbers of non-Whites are being increased not only by natural reproduction rates, but also by mixing with Whites. The 1990 census in France showed that where young Algerian women had live-in partners, in nearly a quarter of cases the partner was White; and the younger the Algerian women, the higher the proportion of White partners.

African illegal immigrants into France
are detained by French police.

In 1975, the French census figures showed that for Algerian mothers, the proportion of births where the father was White rose from 6.2 per cent, to 27.5 per cent in 1990. This in effect means a dramatically increasing mixed-race younger generation, who are not counted as "non-resident nationals" by the Eurostat calculations, but who are not White either.


Germany - TURKISH POPULATION FUELED BY LABOR POLICY

The largest source of non-White immigration into Germany has been from Turkey, although the liberal asylum laws that country had until the mid 1990s encouraged several million other non-White immigration waves from Africa and Asia as well.

The German constitution adopted immediately after the Second World War compelled the country to accept virtually any refugee who was fleeing political or social violence in their home countries. As most of the Third World is continuously in strife, this was easy enough to prove, and at least a million, and possibly more, non-Whites entered Germany in this way.

This constitutional provision was only changed after public pressure in Germany mounted to the point where it became a national crisis. The result is that there are an estimated 7 million "foreigners" (as the Germans like to codeword non-Whites) in Germany at the end of the 20th century, the majority of whom are Turks. This has created its own set of social problems in Germany: an international conference in Hungary in June 1998, on illegal migration, was told by the German Interior Minister said that foreigners were behind two-thirds of the crimes committed by organized gangs in that country. This issue of foreigner crime has become one of the dominating political issues in Germany, with all mainstream political parties building it into their policy programs.

In 2001, Germany announced that it was creating a special "skilled worker" entrance visa which would allow natives of other countries to settle in Germany, providing they brought with them skills in shortage in Germany,. This was specifically aimed at bringing in Indians from India's Information Technology industry - even though millions of Germans were unemployed and could have easily have been trained up for the positions, had it been the government's intention. Both the German government and German capitalists argued that it would however be "too expensive" to do so, and that importing non-Germans would be a "cheaper" option.


Racial Mixing STILL RELATIVELY LOW IN GERMANY

The number of racially-mixed children in Germany which has resulted from the huge non-White influx, has been substantially smaller than in other European countries: according to the German census of 1975, the number of Turkish mothers giving birth to children with a White father was 0.5 percent - by 1990 this figure stood at 1.2 percent.


Britain - Non-white IMMIGRATION INVASION UNDERWAY SINCE 1950s

Britain actively encouraged non-White immigration from the Commonwealth, starting in the late 1950s. The flow of non-White Commonwealth immigrants has hardly paused since, changing massively the make-up of several major British cities - where the immigrants have tended to concentrate.

With a cross channel ferry steaming past,
illegal immigrants in a French detention
camp wait their turn to try and enter the
UK, a tactic which has increased since the
opening of the Channel Tunnel between
France and Britain.

The vast majority of immigrants have come from three sources: India/Pakistan, the West Indies and West Africa. A measure of the level of non-White immigration into the UK can be gauged from the 1996 statistical survey by that country's Office of National Statistics, which showed that country wide, the 36th most popular name for new babies in the UK was "Mohammed" - an exclusively Muslim name.

Official estimates put the number of non-Whites in Britain at the end of the 20th century at around 3.5 million - but this does not take into account illegal immigration, which is massive: the Metropolitan Police in London has estimated that there at least half a million illegal immigrants in greater London alone, never mind other non-White concentrations in Birmingham and elsewhere.

A more accurate figure for the total number of non-Whites in Britain as at the end of the 20th Century is probably closer to 5 million, even more if the extremely-high number of mixed-race children are added in.


EXTREMELY PREVALENT Racial Mixing IN BRITAIN

Racial mixing has been extremely prevalent in Britain. According to the 1991 census, taken by the Office for National Statistics in London (ONS), 40 per cent of young Black men in Britain are married to, or live with, a White partner. The trend is less common on the other side of the sexual divide, where one in five young Black women has a partner who is White. (Ethnicity in the 1991 Census, ONS, 1991).


In 1990, One Fifth of all Pre-School Children in LONDON, Britain Were Non-white

The ONS census in 1990 also revealed that some 20 per cent (or one in five) of pre-school children in London, Britain was of mixed race, and the percentage is rising year by year (ibid).

Other facts revealed in the 1991 census showed that:

• Half of all men and women from "Black ethnic" groups are unmarried;
  
  
• Forty per cent of black children are in lone-parent families. This contrasts strikingly with 15 per cent of white children, and 10 per cent of Asian children;
  
  
• There is a high level of mixed-Black/West Indian and White live-in partners, accounting for up to a third of all "Black" households;
  
  
• All the ethnic minorities are concentrated in towns and cities and this concentration is increasing.

Britain has, as a result of this large non-White influx, suffered a large number of Black riots, the most serious of which occurred in 1981, when countrywide riots saw large areas of many inner cities razed to the ground.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - Third World Immigration Starts After 1960

Until the 1960s, most immigrants to the United States came from Europe. Mexicans had however long since been crossing the border to seek employment in the White created prosperity that was North America: an estimated 500,000 Mexicans entered America, legally and illegally, in the 1930s; one million in the 1940s; and 2.5 million in the 1950s.

Starting from 1975, the vast majority of immigrants into America have been from non-White World countries from Asia and Latin America. More than 4 million newcomers entered the United States during the 1970s, rising to more than 6 million arrived in the 1980s; with at least 80 percent of these from Latin America or Asia.

During the 1990s another 10 million entered the country: the largest influx of immigrants in any decade in American history. In the 1980s, concern about the surge of illegal immigrants led Congress to pass legislation aimed at curtailing illegal immigration.

The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, mandated penalties for employers who hire illegal aliens.


HISPANIC Immigration SET TO SWAMP MANY SOUTHERN STATES

A 1996 report on population trends in America, issued by that country's official census office, revealed the full extent of Mexican and other Hispanic immigration from Central and South America. The report predicted that natural Hispanic reproduction rates will mean that by the 2005, Hispanics will surpass Blacks as the largest minority. In that respect, the report failed to take into account the effect of mass illegal immigration, and Hispanics surpassed Blacks as the largest minority group in mid 2003, when they officially topped 38.8 million in number.

Mexicans clinging to a rubber tube
attempting to cross into California.
Waves of illegal immigrants have
substantially changed the demographic
make-up of California to the point
where it became a majority non-White
state in 2001. Power blackouts in that
state followed as the infrastructure
had not been developed to meet the
unexpected demand created by the
population increase.

From 2020, the US Census office says, more Mexicans will be added to the population each year than Blacks, Asians and Amerinds combined. From 2019, the relatively youthful Mexican population will have America's lowest death rate.

According to the census bureau, in 1998 there were over ten million Mexican children under the age of eighteen. This has led to entire slices of many of the southern states of America: New Mexico, Texas and southern California, becoming virtual tiny replicas of Mexico, with the lingua franca becoming Mexican Spanish rather than English.


White American Decline

The long-term rise in the number of Hispanics, who have the highest birth and immigration rates in America, will coincide with a decline in the number of Whites, the report states, predicting that by 2028, the number of White Americans dying will exceed those being born.

The population as a whole is projected to increase by 50 per cent by 2050, to 394 million, from 263 million in 1995. Although the White population is set to increase steadily in real numbers, expressed as a percentage of the entire American population, their numbers are in radical decline: in 1996, Whites made up 73.1 per cent of the population. That is projected to fall to 52.8 per cent by 2050.

USA Population Projections, millions (rounded off) 1997 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2100 Total 267 275 298 323 347 370 394 571 White 195 197 202 207 210 210 208 219 White % of total 72.8 71.8 68 64.3 60.5 57 52.8 45.6 (Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports, Series P25-1130, "Population Projections of the United States by Age, Sex, Race, and Hispanic Origin: 1995 to 2050". )

German-ORIGIN AMERICANS ARE THE Largest White Group

According to the 1990 census, the largest White group, about 58 million Americans, was partly or solely of German ancestry. Irish ancestry was reported by 38.7 million Americans, and English ancestry by another 32.7 million.


Children - Non-white DEMOGRAPHIC LEAD

sians' share of the American population will more than double to 8.2 per cent in 2050, and Blacks will rise to 13.6 per cent. The Census Office also reported that in 1995, 21 per cent of White children, 33 per cent of Hispanic children and 56 per cent of Black children lived with one parent. Figures released by the US census Bureau in July 1998, showed that there were at that stage already more Mexican children than Black children in America.


Non-white NUMBERS Growth IN USA

According to the 1990 U.S. census, more than 7.2 million Asians and Pacific Islanders live in the United States. They made up 2.9 percent of the U.S. population, a 107.8 percent increase from 1980, when they constituted only 1.5 percent of the population. After the Vietnam War ended in 1975, many immigrants from Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, and other Southeast Asian countries settled in the United States. Not all Vietnamese Americans have become well-educated and prosperous.

School-dropout rates and the growth of criminal gangs continue to trouble the Vietnamese-American community. In 1990, more than one-fourth of all Vietnamese American families reported income below the poverty level, a rate twice the U.S. average.

While the total U.S. population increased by 9.8 percent between 1980 and 1990 and by an estimated 7.4 percent between 1990 and 1997, the Black population grew by 14.2 percent, from 26.7 million in 1980 to 30.5 million in 1990 and had reached an estimated 33.8 million by 1997.

The Amerind population has staged a remarkable comeback from its low at the end of the 19th century: in 1980, it stood at 1.4 million, rising to 2.1 million in 1990; the population grew 12.1 percent between 1990 and 1997, reaching 2.3 million.


"OVER TWO MILLION" MIXED RACE CHILDREN IN 1998

According to an article in the newspaper, USA Today, of 17 June 1998, the number of mixed-race marriages in the USA was 150,000 in 1960. By 1998 it had increased to "over 1.5 million" and it estimated that the number of mixed-race children in America stood at "over 2 million."


NUMBERS OF MIXED RACE PERSONS ACCORDING TO VOLUNTARY US CENSUS CLASSIFICATION

According to the Washington Post, Tuesday, March 13, 2001; Page A01, nearly 7 million Americans described themselves as multiracial in the 2000 Census, in terms of a voluntary self classification category introduced for the first time. This figure is much higher for children under 18, of whom 4.2 percent were registered as multiracial, compared with 1.9 percent of adults. The major reason, census officials said, was that the number of interracial couples more than quadrupled.

This figure is however a gross underestimation, as many individuals who think of themselves as black, are most certainly of mixed racial origin. It is in fact unusual to find any pure Blacks in large numbers in the USA, something that is reflected in the wide diversity of physical types found amongst that population grouping.


CANADA - MASSIVE ASIAN IMMIGRATION

According to Canadian government figures, from 1981 to 1991, 74 per cent of all legal immigrants to Canada came from non-White countries. During this time there were 1.3 million legal immigrants: 26 per cent came from Europe; 47 per cent came from Asia (Chinese is the fastest-growing mother tongue in Canada); 12 per cent from South America or the Caribbean; 9 per cent from North and Central America, and 6 per cent from Africa.

Due to declining White birth rates - in 1997 the birth rate was 1.67 children born per woman, (less than the replacement rate of 2.1) the Canadian government formally decided in the 1980s to actively seek out further immigrants. The top ten source countries (in order) in 1995, were Hong Kong, India, the Philippines, China, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, England, the United States, and Pakistan.

In 1997, Amerinds officially made up three per cent of the population (865,400), while officially Blacks made up two per cent (576,920). The established Asian population was swelled by 962,000 immigrants in the 1980s - pushing the total of Asians well over the 2,8 million mark.

These are all official figures of legal immigrants: illegal immigration always shadows legal immigration, and it is possible that the actual figures may be nearly double the legal ones.

Given that the total population of Canada in 1996 was 28,846,761, some three million or more legal non-White immigrants have settled in that country prior to the year 2000. In terms of illegal immigrants, the number is of course far higher. All this translates to a non-White population of just under 5 million - or 17 percent of the total population - in 1996. This figure is set to increase exponentially.


AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND - ASIAN AND MIDDLE EASTERN INFLUX

Prior to the 1970s, virtually all immigration to Australia was White: however, like the rest of Europe and North America, the last 25 years of the 20th century has seen a massive increase in non-White immigration into Australia, mostly from Asian countries.

According to the 1991 census, Australia had a population of 16,849,496. The 1995 estimated population, including Christmas Island, Cocos Islands, and Norfolk Island, was 18,338,000.

Australia's total population grew at an annual rate of about 1.4 percent in the early 1990s. The principal reasons for this growth were the continued high level of immigration and the associated increase in the numbers of younger people in the childbearing and childrearing age groups.


AUSTRALIA 27% ASIAN BY 2025

Above left: August 2000: The Woolmera illegal immigrant camp in Australia burns after illegal immigrants started a riot protesting their continued detention. Right: Some of the camp's inmates gathered at the fence.

Some 70 per cent of Australian immigration in the 1990s came from Asian countries. At current levels, local research has shown that Australia will be 27 per cent Asian by 2025, with the Asians already concentrating in the cities, causing the well known White Flight phenomena into the suburbs and countryside.

An anti-immigrant
protest in Australia.

An idea of the rapid Asian population growth can be determined if it is borne in mind that in 1980, Australia's non-Aboriginal non-White population was 250,000. In the last 20 years of the 20th century, this figure has leapfrogged to nearly two million. This is only based on legal non-White immigration figures: Australian police estimated in 1998 that in that year, at least 500 illegal immigrants were entering that country every week, mostly on visitor's visas.


New Zealand - FOLLOWING AUSTRALIAN PATTERN

The population of New Zealand at the 1991 census was 3,434,950. The 1996 population estimate was 3,547,983. According to the 1991 census, approximately 73 percent of the population of New Zealand is White. About 12 percent (some 430,000) are Maori, with the rest being "other Asian" groups - again showing a growth which, when combined with the Maori population, will also start producing racial balances similar to those of Australia by the year 2030.


GLOBAL WHITE DECLINE

Given present immigration trends and natural non-White population growth figures on all three continents - Western Europe, North America, and Australia - it therefore seems unlikely that any of them will retain their White majorities past the year 2100.

In addition to the ever-increasing waves of non-White immigration, another serious factor is the steady reduction in the White birth rate which is further accelerating the process of decline.

A report published in Britain in July 1998, by the Family Policy Studies Center, indicated that one in five women in the UK of childbearing age (that is, born after 1975) are not having any children, mainly due to financial constraints. The figure is double that for women born in 1945 - the numbers have been increasing since 1950.


White Decline - from 30% of World's Population to 15% in 2000

The massive increases in the world's total non-White population also makes serious food for thought: in 1900, the earth's population stood at 1,625 million, with some 485 million being White. This meant that some 30 per cent of the earth's population was White at the beginning of the 20th century.

In the year 2000, the earth's population will stand at around 6,095 million, with around 953 million being White. Although this is an increase, in terms of the total planet's population, it marks a drop of over 50 per cent - in 2000, Whites will make up only 15 per cent of the earth's population.

The exponential and explosive growth of the non-White population of the earth - which effectively doubles itself every 34 years (compared with White population which now only doubles itself every 200 years), means that by the year 2100, only three per cent of the earth's population will be White.

From 1900 to 2100 - a period of 200 years, the proportion of Whites on earth will have dropped from 30 per cent to three percent.

The massive overpopulation taking place in the
non-White world will cause increasing waves of
non-White immigration into the modern White
heartlands of North America, Europe and Australia.
This graph shows the disparity between White
and non-White population growths, based on
United Nations figures. Note the codeword for
the White nations ("developed countries"),
compared to the non-White world ("total world
population").

The BIRTH CONTROL Pill - WHITE SUICIDE TABLET

The 1960s will also go down in history as having introduced one of the most significant factors to affect White numbers in the entire history of the world: the development of the birth control pill, or oral contraceptive, which was first approved for use in the United States in 1965. Social demographic trends have shown that it is only in the Western, White, industrialized countries where contraception is used to any significant degree.

The reproduction rate in White countries (amongst their native populations) has, since the introduction of the pill, dropped to the point where in most White countries it is below the stable replacement rate of 2.4 children per female. In the non-White Third World however, no such restraints exist, and the population grows exponentially as fast as the White population declines in Europe and North America: this demographic time bomb will in the not to distant future have serious consequences for the entire earth.


Non-white Overpopulation Pushes Immigration

The resultant massive overpopulation of the non-White lands of the earth provides the major driver for non-White immigration into the White heartlands of Europe, Australia and North America.

In India, for example, where the population doubles every 30 years, many see no future except emigration to Australia, America or Europe, as over-population pressures at home stretch their already-tenuous infrastructure to breaking point.

The Black African population doubles every 24 years. This is reflected in the ever-increasing number of man-made famines on that continent; and the ever increasing numbers of Black refugees entering Europe, America and Australia.

All of these population shifts are busy altering the population make-ups of the three modern White heartlands - in exactly the same way that has happened to every other White nation in history which has then become swamped and removed from the pages of history.

[Stefanus]

March of the Titans
A History Of The White Race

Chapter 68: Ragnarok - The Coming Fall of the West

PART ONE : SOCIAL DISCORDANCES MARK MULTI-RACIAL SOCIETIES

All the great events of history have a racial basis, the very ebb and flow of history is understood only when it is seen that all of history is the result of racial or sub-racial shifts in power, of tribes or nations conquering others, of lands being occupied by different races, and racial conflict.

Once this common thread is understood, then history stops being a meaningless jumble of seemingly unconnected events, but welds into an obviously connected and predictable flow.

With this knowledge, predicting the future on the basis of what is already known, is not that difficult.

This is particularly so in the light of the facts which have been overviewed in the previous chapter: the increasing numbers of non-Whites flooding Europe, North America and Australia will, without any doubt, lead to a change in the nature of the societies on those continents, which in turn will bring about a change in the nature of the civilization on those continents.

That this will happen is without doubt: it is not even a question of debate, it is a simple fact.

What it means in practical terms is that Western European civilization - as it has been developing since the Late Paleolithic Age, some 27,000 years ago, will vanish and change into something else, a hybrid culture like that of present day India.


THE END OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION

This prospect of a hybrid society may appear attractive to some people, although it will not mean the end of the concept of race (instead of sharp racial divisions, there will be a racial "continuum" sliding from light to dark, as is the case in India).

However, there are others who do not think that this is a desirable end result of 30,000 years of history, and who do not relish themselves or their descendants living in countries which are at best Second World, and, as the demographic balance becomes ever more marked, which will slide into Third World status and then beyond.

Already the effects of the change in the make-up of society can be seen everywhere in Europe, North America or Australia, where one cares to look: an overview of these already clear signs of social discordance is the subject of this final chapter.


Belgium and Black Africa

Of particular concern must be the ever growing African numbers in North America and Europe. Black Africa itself is without question the most backward continent on earth; in 1989, a World Bank report on sub-Saharan Africa (that is, excluding the oil rich Arab states and what was then White ruled South Africa) revealed that the Gross Domestic Product for the entire continent was the same as that of one tiny European country, Belgium (Sunday Times, 26 November 1989).

The possibility of this massive poverty and social chaos being transferred to Europe and North America is not a figment of a wild imagination: indeed, the transfer of that population is already underway, as demonstrated in the preceding chapter.


Social Discordance: The Signs of the Dissolution of the West

At the end of the 20th century, there are very clear signs of social discordance at work in the White West: signs which are unmistakably linked to the changing racial make-up of the societies in question.

Before these discordances are overviewed, the reader should realize that of necessity "groups" are being used to define trends and patterns of behavior. This is so because of the nature of racial dynamics: to use a simple example to explain: One White in a meeting hall of 200 Blacks will hardly be noticed; as a lone individual he will not count. However, 150 Whites in a meeting hall with 50 Blacks will not only count, but they will set the agenda of the meeting as well.

In this way then, racial groups impact upon each other, and racial individuals do not.

This is a critical factor to bear in mind when group statistics of any nature are overviewed: the individual exception does not disprove the group rule; small numbers of individuals do not count, but large groups do.


Race and Crime -The USA AND EUROPE COMPARED

One of the most prominent of all social indicators is the crime rate: it serves as a window onto society, reflecting a large number of factors such as social status, poverty, alienation from society and a host of others.

A comparison of European and American criminal statistics reveals some important insights into how this impacts upon the racial make-up of society. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) produces a regular "Uniform Crime Report", published by the US government in Washington, DC..

In 1992, the figures they produced were first given as a total for America, and then broken down into two racial categories of "Black" and "White". Under the FBI's classification, Mexicans are also classed as White, so separate statistics for this group do not exist.

While this is of course scientifically incorrect, these are nonetheless the only statistics which are publicly available on the matter, and for sake of factual correctness, these figures are used as is in the table below. In addition to this, the European crime statistics for similar crimes have been laid alongside the American statistics for comparison.

Comparison: Crimes per 100,000 Population

Britain France Germany Italy USA American Whites American Blacks Murder 7.4 4.6 4.2 6.0 9.3 5.1 43.4 Robbery 62.6 90.4 47.4 68.6 263.0 126 1,343 Sources: FBI Uniform Crime Reports for U.S. data, The Economist for European data. European data for 1990; American data for 1992

As the table shows, Americans as a whole are more violent than Europeans: twice as likely as Frenchmen to commit murder and more than five times as likely as Germans to commit robbery.

However, as is clear from the separate calculations for American Blacks and Whites, (done by the FBI themselves) it is the very high rates of violent crimes by Blacks - eight times as high as Whites for murder and more than ten times for robbery - that yield this result.

These figures actually overstate the White crime rate, because of FBI's inclusion of Mexicans into the White category.

These figures have a bearing on the perennial American debate over gun control. White Americans, who have easy access to guns, are less likely to kill each other than are the British, who are almost completely disarmed.

This comparison with Europe proves that Whites in the United States have neither a unique "culture of violence'' nor inadequate gun laws. America has a high rate of violent crime because it has a large number of violent Black criminals.


MURDER RATE IN Brazil

Brazil is a nation of some 170 million, the vast majority of whom are mixed-race slum-dwellers: with a well deserved reputation for violence. In Sao Paulo, its largest city with 16 million people, more than 4,500 people are murdered each year. In March 1998 alone, 771 people were killed, more than all the homicides reported in New York City during 1997. (Reuters, 08/16/98, ''Park Maniac'' killer case rivets Brazil).


Canada - EFFECTS OF IMMIGRATION INVASION

The history of the racial balance in Canada serves as a perfect example of the power of normal, mostly peaceful, immigration to change the face of a land utterly within a few hundred years. Initially the Amerinds occupied the territory now known as Canada: they were however not beaten by force of arms, as were their cousins in the United States of America, but were simply pushed back by successive waves of White immigration.

Within two hundred years the face of Canada changed, along with its culture, heritage and all other manifestations of the previous Amerind settlement - changed irreparably by the shift in the racial make-up in the population.

It is therefore ironic that the process which destroyed Amerind culture in Canada is precisely the same process which, at the end of the 20th century, is busy displacing the White culture and civilization in Canada: successive waves of Black and Asian immigrants (combined with the racially mixed offspring produced by physical integration) are busy changing the face of Canada once again.


Minister of Multi-Culturalism

Canada even has a "minister of state for multiculturalism" formally added to the cabinet as early as 1972. In 1986, an affirmative action employment policy was adopted by the Canadian government through which preference is always given to any non-White applicants above that of any similarly qualified White.

As is the case virtually everywhere in the modern White countries at the end of the 20th century, special allowances and privileges are made for non-White races which are then specifically denied to Whites. In Canada, there are in excess of 600 "regional councils", which look after local Amerind affairs.

However, what makes these councils unique is that only Amerinds can be elected to them, and only Amerinds can vote for them: a super-racial discrimination which is officially endorsed by the Canadian government, who would never dream of organizing Whites only "regional councils" to "look after White interests."


Political Separation GRANTED TO INDIANS

The Canadian government has also given separate political rights to Amerinds: in March 1993, the Cree-Naskapi of Quebec and the Sechelt Band of British Columbia, became formally self-governing with municipal status and accountable to an "indigenous" only electorate.

Once again this sort of blatant racial mobilization would probably be the subject of a criminal prosecution if it was carried out by White Canadians. In 1999, a new treaty created another Amerind state, that of Nunavut in the eastern part of the Northwest Territories. This state, specifically created for Canadian Amerinds, is governed by its own legislative assembly, territorial court, and civil service.