EL vs. Yahweh
The Armageddon Choice
Yahweh the "Maker" of Heaven and Earth vs. EL the Creator of Heaven & Earth
The Demiurge is a "maker", a fabricator.
God Most High is a creator, the Creator.
Biomystical Christian theology holds that Christians must discover as Jesus did, the real God the Father and Source of compassion and wisdom which are reflected in Jesus' teachings. Jesus was named after the Hebrew tribal god, Yahweh, but Jesus' teachings are those of the Canaanite God Most High, EL. The Spirit of EL was carried like a Trojan horse within the Hebrew epic as the Messianic concept wherein the earthly king became a "son of EL" by mirroring EL's compassion and wisdom.
Biomystical Christianity holds that Revelation's Armageddon prophesy of a Final Battle actually foretells the Armageddon Choice Christians must make now that the real identity of God Most High has come to light through historical research of ancient Canaanite texts. The Canaanite-Hebrew word for the "Mount of Assembly" where EL presided over His Divine Assembly was "Har M? ed", the Greek translation of which is "Armageddon".
Christians must now choose between following the tribal god of the Jews, Yahweh, or following God Most High as Jesus did. One commands believers to commit evil against their neighbors in order to expand this tribal god's people. The other commands those who would be king to aid the lowly and needy and through them, gives instructions to the people to be compassionate as EL is compassionate and forgiving. One uses power and fear to control the people. The other uses compassion and wisdom winning the respect and love of the people. One is a Tyrant King, and One is a Sage King. Who will Christians follow then? The god of the Jews or God Most High?
This is the Armageddon Choice.
The will of EL Elyon, God Most High, and the prophesy of the death of Yahweh as one of the sons of EL. Psalm 82.
This Psalm reflects the Canaanite pantheon where EL presided over the Divine Assembly of gods called ""Har M? ed" in the Canaanite language which was translated into Greek as "Armageddon". This Psalm is shows the humanitarian aims of EL in His instructions to the other gods. Yahweh was one of those other gods, i.e., a "son of EL" as this Ugarit Canaanite text (KTU 1.1IV 14) shows: sm . bny . yw . ilt: "The name of the son of god, Yahweh." So does Psalm 89:6: "For who in the skies can be compared to Yahweh, who among the sons of EL is like Yahweh"
Lucifer-Usurper-Yahweh.
Yahwehist priests falsely elevate Yahweh to EL Elyon's position as God Most High. Gnostics "knew" there was a false god being worshiped when everyone else didn't...they just didn't know how Yahweh usurped the throne of God Most High.
The Origin of Yahweh: Yahweh was one of the "sons of EL"
"El has taken his place in the assembly of EL, in the midst of the elohim He holds judgment."
Psalm 82:1:
Psalm 29:1:
Psalm 89:6:
From anthropologist Donald Redford:
"The name Yahweh has been an enigma over the centuries. The mystery is compounded by the fact that the vowels were not indicated in early Hebrew script, so its very pronunciation is shrouded with uncertainty--although the form given here, Yahweh, is considered to be the most likely one my most scholars and linguists. Some have speculated that the name is a form of the Hebrew verb hayah, "to be", that conveys the sense of "self-existing one", and that this is being played upon in Exodus 3:14 when Yahweh responds to Moses question about who he is by enigmatically saying, "I AM WHO I AM."
Others are unconvinced. Whether the name has some meaning or not, we do know that the earliest reference to this deity is in name lists from Soleb and Amarah in the late fifteenth century BCE, where we find reference to "Yhw (in) the Land of Shasu". This Yhw is a short form of the tetragrammaton, the name of the God of Moses as written in Hebrew, without vowels: YHWH. Thus, our earliest reference to the Mosaic deity Yahweh connects the Hebrews to the Shasu, whose territory was the mountainous areas of Se'ir in northern Midian east of the Arabah and south of Edom. That the territory of the Shasu was an early center of devotion to Yahweh is supported by a number of biblical references that inform us that "Yahweh came from Sinai, and dawned from Seir upon us; he shone forth from Mount Paran" (Deuteronomy 33:2) and originating in Edom. And, of course, it is at Mount Horeb in Midian that Moses is said to have had his first encounter with Yahweh (Exodus 3:1-3) as well.
Who were the people of Shasu? The name itself is from a Semitic root that means "to travel by foot", identifying the Shasu people as pastoral nomads who migrated with the seasons from one pasturage to another in the western parts of the Near East. Like the Hebrews, the Shasu were cattle-herders who wandered on foot in yearly cycles in search for forage between their home-base lands east of the Arabah and areas as distant as northern Syria and Egypt. Donald Redford (1992, Pp. 257-280) points out that the name is found in Egyptian sources as early as the Eighteenth Dynasty down through the Third Intermediate Period and refers to the nomadic peoples east of Egypt who occupied the southern Transjordan in the plains of Moab and northern Edom and the wastelands around Midian.
According to Redford, Egyptian texts identify six locations within "the land of the Shasu". Five of these can be identified as Se'ir (Edom and northern Midian), Laban (which Redford suggests is probably Libona, south of Amman), Sam'ath (possibly the Shim'ethites, a subdivision of the Kenites spoken of in 1 Chron. 2:55), and Wrbr (which Redford suggests is likely the Wady Hasa). Redford also notes that in the 19th and 20th Dynasties, the Shasu are placed consistently in Edom and the Arabah (Timna). Thus, it is no coincidence that it is during his time as a pastoralist shepherd in the mountains of Midian that Moses learns of Yahweh, the Shasu war god who made his home in the volcanic mountains of Shasu."
"There is one Ugaritic text which seems to indicate that among the inhabitants of Ugarit, Yahweh was viewed as another son of El. KTU 1.1 IV 14 says:
sm . bny . yw . ilt
"The name of the son of god, Yahweh."
This text seems to show that Yahweh was known at Ugarit, though not as the Lord but as one of the many sons of El."
The Great Angel
I have recently found a author, Prof. Margaret Barker, a bible scholar who seems to be researching the origin of Yahweh as a Son of God and coming to much the same conclusions as I have following my own studies and insights. I recommend her book "The Great Angel" to see how archeological evidence and careful study of existing Judeo-Christian texts shows the true relationship of Yahweh as Son to EL, God the Father.
Interestingly enough I must acknowledge that Joseph Smith the founder of the Mormon Church despite his fudging his LDS religious history in order to create Mormonism as a new organized religion, actually did spiritually arrive at the knowledge of the Elohim and Yahweh's true identity long before bible scholars. I find it significant that he too included Native Americans in his spiritual revelations in the Book of Mormon. In the Great Angel reference page you can read of a Mormon scholar's opinion of Margaret Barker's theory and others relevant to showing the true identity of Yahweh as a son of EL in the ancient Canaanite pantheon. It has been interesting to me to discover that John Smith too questioned the identity of Yahweh as his revelations of the Elohim were similar to my own.
Please see The Great Angel book reviews page for reviews of Margaret Barker's book that give her theories on how Yahweh was first worshipped as an angel of EL Elyon.
EL as Jah
Elijah means "My God Most High is Jah" and Elijah must come before the Messiah. Jesus transformed Yahweh into "Jah" as Jah is known to us now via the Ethiopian-Rastafarian Christian tradition of Jah as Love, the love Jesus showed the world. In spiritual symbolism the Ark of the Covenant resides in Ethiopia. Rastafarians carry the Ethiopian connection which holds the image of the transformed Yahweh as "Jah", transformed from a tyrant into a loving God, a true blending of EL and and his Son who paid his price for our salvation, for salvation is of Yahweh, the literal meaning of Jesus' name.
The Warring Brothers or Warring Twins
Here is another way I look at the difference between EL and Yahweh. Together they form the archetype of the warring brothers or twins that in pagan and pre-Judeo-Christian religions usually represented the Sun's daily and yearly cycle.
Osirus and Set, Cain and Abel, Esau and Jacob, Castor and Pollux, Ahura Mazda and Ahriman, etc.
There is a Rising Sun and a Setting Sun, dawn to noon, noon to dusk, Winter Solstice to Summer Solstice and back.
These are the heavenly models of God as God the Father. When God is God the Great Mother or Goddess you get the three images instead of two, representing virgin, mother, and crone, birth, life, and death.
From Internet Talkboard Postings
Since my "ministry" as such exists in the form of theological discussions on various Internet talkboards, I have included some postings I have made that amplify the reasons why knowledge of the true God Most High is being restored in our times.
For those who have followed my postings and visited my website they will know that I am convinced I have discovered just who the God was that Jesus was in spiritual contact with, a God that should have had the characteristics of the Old Testament God Yahweh but didn't seem to at all judging by Jesus' teachings from his "good Father".
Unlike Yahweh of the Old Testament, Jesus' good Father in heaven was more interested in having Jesus teach us about spreading the spiritual Kingdom of God in the world as neighborly love, compassion, and non-judgment than he was in having Jesus teach us like the Old Testament prophets about Yahweh's intolerance of human weakness, Yahweh's righteous anger and very conditional love given to his believers, a love that would be withdrawn from any who disobeyed his commandments.
The parts of the New Testament gospels that most people remember about Jesus' instructions from his good Father to be taught to the world don't carry much indication at all of Yahweh's wrathful, vengeful, Old Testament character, a fact that has puzzled many believers for nearly 2000 years. Many of the original Gnostic Christians went so far as to claim Yahweh wasn't the highest god at all, that he was a sub-god, an inept and ignorant one at that who had bungled Creation and made it filled with pain and misery and a spiritual trap for human souls.
The highest god for these early Gnostics was an Alien God only connected to the sub-god Yahweh's botched job of a world through a long series of emanated intermediary spiritual beings or realities called "aeons". For the old Gnostics our physical world and material reality in general was thought to be bad and something to be dealt with as little as possible. The true life was to be found not on earth but in the Gnostic's soul returning after being imprisoned in the material body to repose eternally in the Gnostic's true home in the spiritual Light of God. The world, the physical body and its regenerative needs, were no good, just traps for the soul according to early Gnostic theologies.
Although my own religious conversion experience shared a lot of Gnostic-like themes, this one, of condemnation of Creation wasn't one of them. God never condemned the world in my first religious experience of Gnosis or in any spiritual revelatory experiences I've had periodically over the years since my first one. I couldn't agree with the old Gnostic position that Creation was inherently bad. True, the material world is bound by some harsh realities like death and destruction but it was also the matrix in which the gems of Life are to be found; beauty, love and goodness.
If you think about it, all our concepts of Heaven are based on the most pleasing aspects of life on earth. So for me, as for other modern Gnostics, Creation or the material world is good, our material bodies are not inherently evil because human consciousness of spiritual reality cannot take place without one's material body to perceive it. But if Yahweh isn't the Creator of our material world and ourselves, who is? And if Jesus' good Father in heaven didn't seem like Yahweh of the Old Testament, who was he?
About a year ago I think it's been now, I was in another one of my "episodes" of spiritual revelation. I was lead by the Spirit to research ancient Middle Eastern religions. When I started reading about the characteristics of the ancient Canaanites' highest God, EL, a wave of recognition swept over me. To the Canaanites, EL was pictured just like God has been popularly imaged in our Christian traditions, a kindly grandfather type with a long grey or white beard and long hair. But it was EL's loving and non-judgmental characteristics mirrored in the Canaanite appellations for him--"EL the Compassionate One", "EL the Kindly One", "EL the Merciful One", and "EL the Creator", that I said to myself, "oh my God! This is Jesus' "good Father"! This is who Jesus got his spiritual instructions from! And this guy is not Yahweh!
Yes, I knew that the Hebrew God had several non-Yahweh names and the name EL was a primary one. I knew that the Hebrew epic began with Abraham's encounter with a God Most High who made a pact with Abraham promising all of the land of Canaan as a new home for the Hebrews. I knew that the name of this God Most High was probably EL because both Canaanites and Hebrews used the name EL Elyon, God Most High as an appellation for this God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. I knew that the original Creation story in Genesis God was referred to as Elohim, a plural form of EL. And I knew that Jacob, Abraham's grandson, encountered a God named EL because Jacob built an altar at the spot where he had his dream of the Ladder to Heaven, a spot known before as Luz but changed by Jacob to "Bethel" or "House of EL". However, for all the incorporation of the EL name for God into the Hebrew religion of Yahweh, e.g. Isra-El, EL-ijah, Ezeki-EL, and a host of other Hebrew names that begin or end with "EL", EL's sweet Canaanite characteristics never made it until they were manifested again by Jesus.
Within the Hebrew epic the name of God as EL appears in significant places as forecasting the Messiah. Isaiah, the Old Testament prophet Christianity looks to the most for his Messianic prophesies, uses the name "Immanuel" meaning literally "The God EL is with us" as the name for the Messianic Child to be born. And the gospel accounts of Jesus' birth also repeat Isaiah's Immanuel prophesy but don't really explain why Jesus was not named Immanuel. In Luke's account he has the angel Gabriel (EL again), repeat the Isaiah prophesy but with "Immanuel" part switched to "Jesus".
Then there is the mysterious cry from Jesus on the cross in Aramaic in Mark and Matthew's gospels "Eli (or Eloi), Eli, lama sabachthani?", literally, "My God EL, My God EL, why hast thou forsaken me?" And EL did seem to have forsaken the Jesus as Jesus became Yahwehized again when Paul, Mark and the rest of the New Testament writers took the earlier traditions of the followers of Jesus and Jesus' good Father in heaven and put the fear of the Old Testament God back into Christianity.
The Christian God was a God of Love in theory but he would also roast you in Hell forever if you didn't obey his written word, i.e., the Roman Church Father's authorized New Testament selection of early Christian texts. With the Book of Revelation added, the God of Wrath and vengeance makes the Yahweh victory over EL complete. Traditional Christianity would become known the world it conquered by brutality and intolerance that followed these same Yahweh characteristics. Or so it would seem.
Gnostic and other non-traditional Christian rebellions occurred right from the start and continued here and there through the centuries of the rise and establishment of Christianity as the leading religion in Western Civilization. But it hasn't been until our New Millennium that these counter-Christian theologies could ever seem to pose a real threat to established Christian beliefs based mainly upon fear of a Yahweh type God. Oh, Christians would claim love and compassion for their fellow man but the overall history of Christian social practice reveals otherwise. But thankfully, there were and are always exceptions to this general trend enabling Christianity to produce Christians periodically who actually followed Jesus' EL-like teachings.
A, the main reference I use for my information on Canaan is John Gray's "Near Eastern Mythologies". This is where you will find out about how EL was the God Canaanites went to to ask for forgiveness of sins even though most of the time EL seems remote from human affairs concerned mainly with the Assembly of Gods, seeing to it Order and not Chaos ruled Creation by keeping tabs on Baal in Baal's yearly battles with the gods of Chaos and destruction of society or the harvest that society was absolutely dependent on.
I know the expressions of concern for widows and orphans is in Gray's book and I know I have read elsewhere of Mesopotamian and Egyptian concerns for these classes of people expressed identically to the Hebrews but I can't remember off hand where these other references are found.
There is no doubt that the Hebrew Codes increased the humaneness of social laws in the ancient Near East, probably surpassing the Canaanite social conduct codes of which we have little information. I don't know of an equivalent Code of Hammurabi or Moses for Canaan or specific Canaanite cities. But one must remember the Canaanites were the Phoenicians (both words, Canaanite and Greek, mean "purple" and stood for the purple dye Canaanite coastal cities were famous for) and were known mainly for their trading.
The Phoenicians got around, perhaps even to America. We owe them our alphabet. They were not known to history for grossly violent evil acts against their neighbors which would go against their trade relationships anyway. The Hebrews gave the Canaanites a bum rap because they wanted the land of Canaan all for themselves.
So for my Canaanite information I read Gray. His information I trust more than others because he taught Semitic Languages in Palestine as well as Scotland, was a minister, and he made a point of not exploiting this sensational Canaanite information as many another would in a bid for fame and fortune. But perhaps that was the times he was writing in- late '50's and '60's.
But even though Gray wrote decades ago this information really is still sensational and every Christian should be aware of pre-Hebrew Canaanite religious beliefs, if for no other reason than to discover the wonderfully mystery of how well the Canaanite conception of EL fits Jesus' "Abba" plus the mystery of why the major Hebrew religious names contain EL in them.
But the beginnings of the Messianic concept can be seen there as well in the concept of the earthly king as a Son of EL who rules the earthly kingdom like EL's rules in heaven, with compassion and wisdom which makes EL's type of kingly rulership radically different from the typical oriental despot/commander-in-chief model God, e.g. YHWH, Marduk, Baal, etc.
If EL has a dark side I haven't found it. That "lurid" story you mention is actually a ribald tale of where EL is made fun of, a Greek-like way of relating a story about this God Most High that humanizes him. Can you imagine Hebrews telling a bawdy story about YHWH? It's the fact that EL was married to Asherah I tell you that makes EL a wiser, kinder God the Father.
But do find a copy of Gray's book. I can't recommend it more highly. There you will find out about the Canaanite and Mesopotamian religious/social concerns for the widow, the orphan, that match Hebrew concerns. Elsewhere I have read of Egyptian concerns for these same lowly classes.
The Hebrews may have broadened the categories for social aid but they didn't invent the morality of altruism. Any society that is going to last has to develop a strong social concern for most if not all members of that society. Actually, in terms of care for the weakest members of society, I have read that the Kalahari Bushpeople surpass all of us in civilized society.
Let us not forget it was the Greeks and not the Hebrews who gave us the Hippocratic Oath as well as the beginnings of democratic idealism. So when you read the Hebrew version of Canaanite morality bear in mind the prejudice. Just like the prejudice of the aggressor European nations used here in America against the native peoples who were "savages" meaning they killed relatively few people with primitive weapons in periodic village raids while Europeans were "civilized" white people, meaning they killed in huge numbers with advanced weapons for territorial conquest and profit.
The Hebrews wanted the Canaanite's land because it was more fertile than the interior desert. Canaan was like California. Coastal sea, forested mountains, fertile valley plains. Not all gravel and sand desert with hardly any vegetation. The Hebrews wanted Canaan but wanted to rule it as Israel from Jerusalem, not the northerly or westerly Canaanite cities. f or for and the earthly kingship. This is where you will find out about how the Canaanite religion and Mesopotamian ones too, had concerns for the widow, the orphan, the bottom wrung members of society that mirror Hebrew concerns.
Please remember I am not a scholar but a visionary servant of God. My scholarship is laughable. Whatever research I do is inspired by visions or religious insights. I am filled with zeal to find out about a certain thing that has curiosity, e.g. why was the Hebrews' Messianic prophesy name contain EL as the name of God instead of one referring to YHWH? So I rush to read what I can get hold of here in my fairly boondocks of a community. So my research is not exhaustive by any means.
I leave it to God for whatever findings I have discovered about God in ancient writings to pass or fail the test of further historical discovery. So far, God's been right on the button about the conclusions I drew early on about using the Bible as a historical reference for ancient Near Eastern religions and cultures.
If you were familiar with the old Gnostic views of YHWH you would know they had about as much use for YHWH as Biomystical Christianity does. In fact, they were so upset with YHWH that they held all of Creation against him, claiming it was a flawed business by an incompetent lower deity who mistakenly thought he was the only god. They thought Creation, the material world was this god's trap for ensnaring souls that desired only to be rejoined with the Light of God.
These early Gnostics had no idea of Canaanite history then and no knowledge that the Canaanite God Most High, EL was a different God than the Hebrew's YHWH because by the time of Christ, the Jews had successfully stripped "EL" of his Canaanite identity to make the word a generic term for "God". But once found, the appellations attributed to EL, the way the Canaanites related to EL, one just has the sense that these people were relating to a Father god whose mildness and non-judgment seems at a far remove from the jealous and vengeful God of Moses.
* *
These "Father" faces of God, EL or YHWH, are just that, "faces" of God seen by humans. Human beings seem incapable of relating to God other than in human being terms which in turn anthropomorphisizes God. In my religious experiences of God, I never hear a voice of God, never meet an angel in the flesh or in dreams or in way experience God as any kind of Being in our human conception of that term.
The closest to establishing an "identity" for the God who meets with me through these synchronicity experiences, is when the name of "Ariel" pops up unexpectedly in synchronistic fashion, e.g. I am visiting my sister in Portland and while I am there somebody is spraying the name "Ariel" around downtown Portland, or like when I went sightseeing up the mountain road to Mt. St. Helens because the eruption of this mountain came months after my religious experience and I thought it might be a sign for further major showings of God's Plan. (the sun was darkened and the moon did turn red in the path of ash from St. Helens). So no big sign from God relating to Mt. St. Helens and me except I run into the little town of Ariel. Stuff like that.
The way God intervenes in my life it makes it hard for me to see any real difference between what I experience as God's guidance in my life and a Path that was already there to begin. Once this Path is found it must be tread because there are no other paths that lead to the ultimate truth of reality which is that reality is all controlled by God, reality is God in the sense that there is no separation possible of material things and events from the hidden or spiritual archetypes or forms of God underlying their existence.
So when I use "EL" for the Father face of God or "Asherah" for the Mother face of God, I do not see these with pagan Canaanite eyes as separate Deities, each with their own separate natures, powers, and areas of sovereignty, but as the primary archetypal aspects of the One God, the Holy One.
The Gnostics were careful to make a distinction between aspects or "emanations" from God and God Itself as a singularity, ultimately inconceivable to the human mind. This keeps Gnosticism monotheistic as opposed to Trinitarian belief. God is always One. When Biomystical Christianity talks of God the Father and the Great Mother it is still in reference to the Holy One as a Unity of these primary opposing aspects of Life that coincide with the primary opposing aspects of Creation, spirit and matter.
If the YHWH Tetragrammaton had kept to symbolizing God as Father-Mother-Son-Daughter it would be easier to keep it as the primary term for God but YHWH is far too associated with Scriptures describing the actions of a very male, tyrant-King type of god, far too harsh in character for the softening Kabbalistic interpretations of the name to overcome.
When I read Gen 3:17 I understand God to be cursing the ground for humankind, cursing humankind to a life of drudgery and toil, and withholding the information about eternal life that Jesus brought. Yes, you are correct in that in those verses God doesn't outright say "eternally" but says "all the days of your life". Since Adam stood as a representative of all humanity "all the days" of Adam's life equal all the days of humanity. If Adam doesn't represent all of humanity then God's commandments and curses apply only to him and perhaps Eve, but not to anyone else.
But Jews and then Christians following Jesus' own self-styling of himself as the "Son of Adam", i.e, as another universal Man like Adam and representing all of humanity, so my reasoning is true, what God did to the first Adam applies to all humanity, at least until Jesus came along and broke the curse of "dust to dust" with knowledge from the Tree of Knowledge about the fruit of the Tree of Life, eternal life, such knowledge the God in Adam and Eve forbids as punishment for his created beings not performing to his desires and that, as I have stated before is not responsible adult parental behavior one should expect from a God touted to be our "Father".
Don't get the idea that just because I am putting this argument out here now that the God in the Adam and Eve story is cruel, not a loving God at all, and also, not omniscient, e.g., "Where are you?" not even knowing where Adam was, that I springing some new Arielite doctrine on you. This view of Yahweh was quite common in Gnostic Christian texts and even one very prominent early Christian theologian who nearly became Bishop of Rome, Marcion, held the exact same viewpoint.
He taught that with Jesus' teachings from his "good Father", the true God had surely shown the world that It had broken with the Judaic line with its limited understanding of God as an often savage and cruel tyrant, Yahweh. To Marcion, only those Christian writings that were free of contamination of the teachings of old Jewish God were valid. So don't think for a moment that because I reject the Old Testament God as the highest spiritual authority, that I reject the true God, the God Jesus worshipped.
I know that God. That God is EL and you can discover for yourselves the difference between EL and Yahweh by going beyond the Jewish prejudice in favor of their tribal God, Yahweh, e.g., saying only that "EL" is merely another name of God, to researching EL's roots in the Promised Land, ancient Canaan. There you will find Jesus' Good Father and the Creator. There you find EL the Compassionate One, EL the Merciful One, EL the Kindly One, EL the Creator, these are the epithets of EL that the Canaanites gave to their God Most High.
The Messiah represents EL as Isaiah shows in the name to be given the Messianic Child, "Immanuel", literally "the God EL is with us". I don't acknowledge God as Yahweh but I do acknowledge that God has worked through the "Yahweh" face shown to the world through the Hebrews. But since Jesus' time the prophesy of the necessity of Elijah coming first has been fulfilled. "Elijah", literally "EL is Jah", EL is Yahweh, the new Good Father face of God to the Jews and to all of us. Instead of being christened Immanuel, Jesus bore Yahweh's name but still He clearly taught EL's compassion and mercy. Therefore, through Jesus, we know EL has become the prominent face of God the Father.
The full Godhead is ELohim and is deliberately a plural noun but represents a single Holy One. I once was willing to toss Yahweh out altogether but God changed my mind. There was a spiritual reason why the face of God to humanity had to go through Yahweh. In ancient times, while EL was Canaan's God Most High and had all the characteristics of Jesus' Good Father and none of Yahweh's tyranny, EL was still just the highest one in a pantheon of deities, each with their own "turf" and ways of acting, i.e, EL was part of true polytheism where there was no concept of a God of All, a single Holy One, incorporating everything in the Universe in Itself.
So to bring that spiritual understanding to humankind God had to establish the concept of monotheism, recognition of a single God of All somewhere which It did first through the Egyptian Pharaoh, Aknaton, then through the Hebrews, when Aknaton blew it by seeing the single God symbolized by the sun, RA, which obviously leaves out the earth, the moon, humanity and Life--not a good symbol for a God of All. But the Yahweh face of the single God of All was deficient from the start as the Yahweh version of the Genesis of humankind, the Adam and Eve story shows all who have not let their faith blind them to truth. The ELohim version, is the one I take as truth in symbolic spiritual form.
ELohim is my God whom I love and obey and who guides me with Its Spirit of Christ. You can keep yourself in spiritual bondage to the Old Testament God but Jesus showed you the truth, and I show you the truth. Later on, when you're more spiritually mature, the Spirit of Christ will show you the Feminine face of ELohim, the Holy One, because God has a Father and a Mother face just as we are made in Its Image, male and female.
* *
God does not change but human understanding of It does. That's why the God Jesus worshipped and whose will he followed and told us to follow can no longer be Yahweh, the tribal god of the Jews. Yahweh was the Hebrew understanding of God as God the Father only. Yahweh was God's darker side from the beginning. Yahweh from the beginning was a savage face of God, a tribal god only really interested in making sure the Jews would follow his Laws by threat of calamity and/or unending punishment.
The moment Yahweh held his created beings eternally responsible for not obeying him and finding out the Truth for themselves is the moment Yahweh reveals his warped character. No responsible human parent would hold their innocent children responsible for lack of knowledge but Yahweh did just that. The moment God told Abraham to kill his son for him, Yahweh again showed his true dark side character. No loving parent would ever demand such obedience that demands destruction of a loving relationship, father to son, in order to appease a tyrant god.
All the Goodness of God is from EL. All the unmerciful judgment, all the lies given to the Hebrews as truths, e.g., follow the Commandment not to murder yet then in the Mosaic Law codes demands murder and orders murder, even genocide of men, women and children as can be seen in the story of Joshua. No god of Justice as is claimed for Yahweh would ever call justice the stealing of another people's land yet Yahweh did just that when the Hebrews invaded Canaan, genocided the people, stole their land, stole the name of their God Most High even, such acts again reversing the Ten Commandments not to covet anything of thy neighbor's.
The true Creator reached Jesus as the Spirit of EL as prophesy demanded because the Creator wanted us to know who the real God the Father was, who Jesus' good Father was. The Goodness of God is through the Spirit of EL which is why the name of EL figures so prominently in Hebrew scriptures even though to them Yahweh is their tribal god. The prophesy of the Messiah included the prophesy of the return of the Spirit of EL back into Hebrew consciousness thus the prophesied Messianic name of "Immanuel", literally "EL is with us". Jesus was the Holy One's way of showing the Jews and then the whole world, the Gentiles, that Yahweh was to be dethroned as the God the Father face of Itself. The Holy One through Jesus (named after Yahweh) sacrificed Yahweh so that the Spirit of EL could be resurrected and reborn into first Jewish then Gentile spiritual understanding of the true Godhead.
But until you search, until you find out who EL really was before the Hebrew's came into EL's homeland and stole EL's name to add to the names of their tribal god, Yahweh, you will never discover who Jesus' Good Father is. You won't discover EL the Compassionate One, EL the Merciful One, EL the Kindly One, all these being the character defining names that the Canaanites understood their God Most High.
The Armageddon Choice
Yahweh the "Maker" of Heaven and Earth vs. EL the Creator of Heaven & Earth
The Demiurge is a "maker", a fabricator.
God Most High is a creator, the Creator.
Biomystical Christian theology holds that Christians must discover as Jesus did, the real God the Father and Source of compassion and wisdom which are reflected in Jesus' teachings. Jesus was named after the Hebrew tribal god, Yahweh, but Jesus' teachings are those of the Canaanite God Most High, EL. The Spirit of EL was carried like a Trojan horse within the Hebrew epic as the Messianic concept wherein the earthly king became a "son of EL" by mirroring EL's compassion and wisdom.
Biomystical Christianity holds that Revelation's Armageddon prophesy of a Final Battle actually foretells the Armageddon Choice Christians must make now that the real identity of God Most High has come to light through historical research of ancient Canaanite texts. The Canaanite-Hebrew word for the "Mount of Assembly" where EL presided over His Divine Assembly was "Har M? ed", the Greek translation of which is "Armageddon".
Christians must now choose between following the tribal god of the Jews, Yahweh, or following God Most High as Jesus did. One commands believers to commit evil against their neighbors in order to expand this tribal god's people. The other commands those who would be king to aid the lowly and needy and through them, gives instructions to the people to be compassionate as EL is compassionate and forgiving. One uses power and fear to control the people. The other uses compassion and wisdom winning the respect and love of the people. One is a Tyrant King, and One is a Sage King. Who will Christians follow then? The god of the Jews or God Most High?
This is the Armageddon Choice.
The will of EL Elyon, God Most High, and the prophesy of the death of Yahweh as one of the sons of EL. Psalm 82.
"EL stands in the congregation of the mighty;
He judges among the gods.
How long will you judge unjustly,
And show partiality to the wicked? Selah
Defend the poor and fatherless;
Do justice to the afflicted and needy.
Deliver the poor and needy;
Free them from the hand of the wicked.
They do not know, nor do they understand;
They walk about in darkness;
All the foundations of the earth are unstable.
I said, 'You are gods, and all of you are children of the Most High.
But you shall die like men, and fall like one of the princes.'
Arise, O EL, judge the earth;
For You shall inherit all nations."
He judges among the gods.
How long will you judge unjustly,
And show partiality to the wicked? Selah
Defend the poor and fatherless;
Do justice to the afflicted and needy.
Deliver the poor and needy;
Free them from the hand of the wicked.
They do not know, nor do they understand;
They walk about in darkness;
All the foundations of the earth are unstable.
I said, 'You are gods, and all of you are children of the Most High.
But you shall die like men, and fall like one of the princes.'
Arise, O EL, judge the earth;
For You shall inherit all nations."
This Psalm reflects the Canaanite pantheon where EL presided over the Divine Assembly of gods called ""Har M? ed" in the Canaanite language which was translated into Greek as "Armageddon". This Psalm is shows the humanitarian aims of EL in His instructions to the other gods. Yahweh was one of those other gods, i.e., a "son of EL" as this Ugarit Canaanite text (KTU 1.1IV 14) shows: sm . bny . yw . ilt: "The name of the son of god, Yahweh." So does Psalm 89:6: "For who in the skies can be compared to Yahweh, who among the sons of EL is like Yahweh"
Lucifer-Usurper-Yahweh.
Yahwehist priests falsely elevate Yahweh to EL Elyon's position as God Most High. Gnostics "knew" there was a false god being worshiped when everyone else didn't...they just didn't know how Yahweh usurped the throne of God Most High.
The Origin of Yahweh: Yahweh was one of the "sons of EL"
"El has taken his place in the assembly of EL, in the midst of the elohim He holds judgment."
Psalm 82:1:
"Ascribe to Yahweh, O sons of EL, ascribe to Yahweh glory and strength."
Psalm 29:1:
"For who in the skies can be compared to Yahweh, who among the sons of EL is like Yahweh,"
Psalm 89:6:
From anthropologist Donald Redford:
"The name Yahweh has been an enigma over the centuries. The mystery is compounded by the fact that the vowels were not indicated in early Hebrew script, so its very pronunciation is shrouded with uncertainty--although the form given here, Yahweh, is considered to be the most likely one my most scholars and linguists. Some have speculated that the name is a form of the Hebrew verb hayah, "to be", that conveys the sense of "self-existing one", and that this is being played upon in Exodus 3:14 when Yahweh responds to Moses question about who he is by enigmatically saying, "I AM WHO I AM."
Others are unconvinced. Whether the name has some meaning or not, we do know that the earliest reference to this deity is in name lists from Soleb and Amarah in the late fifteenth century BCE, where we find reference to "Yhw (in) the Land of Shasu". This Yhw is a short form of the tetragrammaton, the name of the God of Moses as written in Hebrew, without vowels: YHWH. Thus, our earliest reference to the Mosaic deity Yahweh connects the Hebrews to the Shasu, whose territory was the mountainous areas of Se'ir in northern Midian east of the Arabah and south of Edom. That the territory of the Shasu was an early center of devotion to Yahweh is supported by a number of biblical references that inform us that "Yahweh came from Sinai, and dawned from Seir upon us; he shone forth from Mount Paran" (Deuteronomy 33:2) and originating in Edom. And, of course, it is at Mount Horeb in Midian that Moses is said to have had his first encounter with Yahweh (Exodus 3:1-3) as well.
Who were the people of Shasu? The name itself is from a Semitic root that means "to travel by foot", identifying the Shasu people as pastoral nomads who migrated with the seasons from one pasturage to another in the western parts of the Near East. Like the Hebrews, the Shasu were cattle-herders who wandered on foot in yearly cycles in search for forage between their home-base lands east of the Arabah and areas as distant as northern Syria and Egypt. Donald Redford (1992, Pp. 257-280) points out that the name is found in Egyptian sources as early as the Eighteenth Dynasty down through the Third Intermediate Period and refers to the nomadic peoples east of Egypt who occupied the southern Transjordan in the plains of Moab and northern Edom and the wastelands around Midian.
According to Redford, Egyptian texts identify six locations within "the land of the Shasu". Five of these can be identified as Se'ir (Edom and northern Midian), Laban (which Redford suggests is probably Libona, south of Amman), Sam'ath (possibly the Shim'ethites, a subdivision of the Kenites spoken of in 1 Chron. 2:55), and Wrbr (which Redford suggests is likely the Wady Hasa). Redford also notes that in the 19th and 20th Dynasties, the Shasu are placed consistently in Edom and the Arabah (Timna). Thus, it is no coincidence that it is during his time as a pastoralist shepherd in the mountains of Midian that Moses learns of Yahweh, the Shasu war god who made his home in the volcanic mountains of Shasu."
"There is one Ugaritic text which seems to indicate that among the inhabitants of Ugarit, Yahweh was viewed as another son of El. KTU 1.1 IV 14 says:
sm . bny . yw . ilt
"The name of the son of god, Yahweh."
This text seems to show that Yahweh was known at Ugarit, though not as the Lord but as one of the many sons of El."
The Great Angel
I have recently found a author, Prof. Margaret Barker, a bible scholar who seems to be researching the origin of Yahweh as a Son of God and coming to much the same conclusions as I have following my own studies and insights. I recommend her book "The Great Angel" to see how archeological evidence and careful study of existing Judeo-Christian texts shows the true relationship of Yahweh as Son to EL, God the Father.
Interestingly enough I must acknowledge that Joseph Smith the founder of the Mormon Church despite his fudging his LDS religious history in order to create Mormonism as a new organized religion, actually did spiritually arrive at the knowledge of the Elohim and Yahweh's true identity long before bible scholars. I find it significant that he too included Native Americans in his spiritual revelations in the Book of Mormon. In the Great Angel reference page you can read of a Mormon scholar's opinion of Margaret Barker's theory and others relevant to showing the true identity of Yahweh as a son of EL in the ancient Canaanite pantheon. It has been interesting to me to discover that John Smith too questioned the identity of Yahweh as his revelations of the Elohim were similar to my own.
Please see The Great Angel book reviews page for reviews of Margaret Barker's book that give her theories on how Yahweh was first worshipped as an angel of EL Elyon.
EL as Jah
Elijah means "My God Most High is Jah" and Elijah must come before the Messiah. Jesus transformed Yahweh into "Jah" as Jah is known to us now via the Ethiopian-Rastafarian Christian tradition of Jah as Love, the love Jesus showed the world. In spiritual symbolism the Ark of the Covenant resides in Ethiopia. Rastafarians carry the Ethiopian connection which holds the image of the transformed Yahweh as "Jah", transformed from a tyrant into a loving God, a true blending of EL and and his Son who paid his price for our salvation, for salvation is of Yahweh, the literal meaning of Jesus' name.
The Warring Brothers or Warring Twins
Here is another way I look at the difference between EL and Yahweh. Together they form the archetype of the warring brothers or twins that in pagan and pre-Judeo-Christian religions usually represented the Sun's daily and yearly cycle.
Osirus and Set, Cain and Abel, Esau and Jacob, Castor and Pollux, Ahura Mazda and Ahriman, etc.
There is a Rising Sun and a Setting Sun, dawn to noon, noon to dusk, Winter Solstice to Summer Solstice and back.
These are the heavenly models of God as God the Father. When God is God the Great Mother or Goddess you get the three images instead of two, representing virgin, mother, and crone, birth, life, and death.
From Internet Talkboard Postings
Since my "ministry" as such exists in the form of theological discussions on various Internet talkboards, I have included some postings I have made that amplify the reasons why knowledge of the true God Most High is being restored in our times.
For those who have followed my postings and visited my website they will know that I am convinced I have discovered just who the God was that Jesus was in spiritual contact with, a God that should have had the characteristics of the Old Testament God Yahweh but didn't seem to at all judging by Jesus' teachings from his "good Father".
Unlike Yahweh of the Old Testament, Jesus' good Father in heaven was more interested in having Jesus teach us about spreading the spiritual Kingdom of God in the world as neighborly love, compassion, and non-judgment than he was in having Jesus teach us like the Old Testament prophets about Yahweh's intolerance of human weakness, Yahweh's righteous anger and very conditional love given to his believers, a love that would be withdrawn from any who disobeyed his commandments.
The parts of the New Testament gospels that most people remember about Jesus' instructions from his good Father to be taught to the world don't carry much indication at all of Yahweh's wrathful, vengeful, Old Testament character, a fact that has puzzled many believers for nearly 2000 years. Many of the original Gnostic Christians went so far as to claim Yahweh wasn't the highest god at all, that he was a sub-god, an inept and ignorant one at that who had bungled Creation and made it filled with pain and misery and a spiritual trap for human souls.
The highest god for these early Gnostics was an Alien God only connected to the sub-god Yahweh's botched job of a world through a long series of emanated intermediary spiritual beings or realities called "aeons". For the old Gnostics our physical world and material reality in general was thought to be bad and something to be dealt with as little as possible. The true life was to be found not on earth but in the Gnostic's soul returning after being imprisoned in the material body to repose eternally in the Gnostic's true home in the spiritual Light of God. The world, the physical body and its regenerative needs, were no good, just traps for the soul according to early Gnostic theologies.
Although my own religious conversion experience shared a lot of Gnostic-like themes, this one, of condemnation of Creation wasn't one of them. God never condemned the world in my first religious experience of Gnosis or in any spiritual revelatory experiences I've had periodically over the years since my first one. I couldn't agree with the old Gnostic position that Creation was inherently bad. True, the material world is bound by some harsh realities like death and destruction but it was also the matrix in which the gems of Life are to be found; beauty, love and goodness.
If you think about it, all our concepts of Heaven are based on the most pleasing aspects of life on earth. So for me, as for other modern Gnostics, Creation or the material world is good, our material bodies are not inherently evil because human consciousness of spiritual reality cannot take place without one's material body to perceive it. But if Yahweh isn't the Creator of our material world and ourselves, who is? And if Jesus' good Father in heaven didn't seem like Yahweh of the Old Testament, who was he?
About a year ago I think it's been now, I was in another one of my "episodes" of spiritual revelation. I was lead by the Spirit to research ancient Middle Eastern religions. When I started reading about the characteristics of the ancient Canaanites' highest God, EL, a wave of recognition swept over me. To the Canaanites, EL was pictured just like God has been popularly imaged in our Christian traditions, a kindly grandfather type with a long grey or white beard and long hair. But it was EL's loving and non-judgmental characteristics mirrored in the Canaanite appellations for him--"EL the Compassionate One", "EL the Kindly One", "EL the Merciful One", and "EL the Creator", that I said to myself, "oh my God! This is Jesus' "good Father"! This is who Jesus got his spiritual instructions from! And this guy is not Yahweh!
Yes, I knew that the Hebrew God had several non-Yahweh names and the name EL was a primary one. I knew that the Hebrew epic began with Abraham's encounter with a God Most High who made a pact with Abraham promising all of the land of Canaan as a new home for the Hebrews. I knew that the name of this God Most High was probably EL because both Canaanites and Hebrews used the name EL Elyon, God Most High as an appellation for this God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. I knew that the original Creation story in Genesis God was referred to as Elohim, a plural form of EL. And I knew that Jacob, Abraham's grandson, encountered a God named EL because Jacob built an altar at the spot where he had his dream of the Ladder to Heaven, a spot known before as Luz but changed by Jacob to "Bethel" or "House of EL". However, for all the incorporation of the EL name for God into the Hebrew religion of Yahweh, e.g. Isra-El, EL-ijah, Ezeki-EL, and a host of other Hebrew names that begin or end with "EL", EL's sweet Canaanite characteristics never made it until they were manifested again by Jesus.
Within the Hebrew epic the name of God as EL appears in significant places as forecasting the Messiah. Isaiah, the Old Testament prophet Christianity looks to the most for his Messianic prophesies, uses the name "Immanuel" meaning literally "The God EL is with us" as the name for the Messianic Child to be born. And the gospel accounts of Jesus' birth also repeat Isaiah's Immanuel prophesy but don't really explain why Jesus was not named Immanuel. In Luke's account he has the angel Gabriel (EL again), repeat the Isaiah prophesy but with "Immanuel" part switched to "Jesus".
Then there is the mysterious cry from Jesus on the cross in Aramaic in Mark and Matthew's gospels "Eli (or Eloi), Eli, lama sabachthani?", literally, "My God EL, My God EL, why hast thou forsaken me?" And EL did seem to have forsaken the Jesus as Jesus became Yahwehized again when Paul, Mark and the rest of the New Testament writers took the earlier traditions of the followers of Jesus and Jesus' good Father in heaven and put the fear of the Old Testament God back into Christianity.
The Christian God was a God of Love in theory but he would also roast you in Hell forever if you didn't obey his written word, i.e., the Roman Church Father's authorized New Testament selection of early Christian texts. With the Book of Revelation added, the God of Wrath and vengeance makes the Yahweh victory over EL complete. Traditional Christianity would become known the world it conquered by brutality and intolerance that followed these same Yahweh characteristics. Or so it would seem.
Gnostic and other non-traditional Christian rebellions occurred right from the start and continued here and there through the centuries of the rise and establishment of Christianity as the leading religion in Western Civilization. But it hasn't been until our New Millennium that these counter-Christian theologies could ever seem to pose a real threat to established Christian beliefs based mainly upon fear of a Yahweh type God. Oh, Christians would claim love and compassion for their fellow man but the overall history of Christian social practice reveals otherwise. But thankfully, there were and are always exceptions to this general trend enabling Christianity to produce Christians periodically who actually followed Jesus' EL-like teachings.
* *
A, the main reference I use for my information on Canaan is John Gray's "Near Eastern Mythologies". This is where you will find out about how EL was the God Canaanites went to to ask for forgiveness of sins even though most of the time EL seems remote from human affairs concerned mainly with the Assembly of Gods, seeing to it Order and not Chaos ruled Creation by keeping tabs on Baal in Baal's yearly battles with the gods of Chaos and destruction of society or the harvest that society was absolutely dependent on.
I know the expressions of concern for widows and orphans is in Gray's book and I know I have read elsewhere of Mesopotamian and Egyptian concerns for these classes of people expressed identically to the Hebrews but I can't remember off hand where these other references are found.
There is no doubt that the Hebrew Codes increased the humaneness of social laws in the ancient Near East, probably surpassing the Canaanite social conduct codes of which we have little information. I don't know of an equivalent Code of Hammurabi or Moses for Canaan or specific Canaanite cities. But one must remember the Canaanites were the Phoenicians (both words, Canaanite and Greek, mean "purple" and stood for the purple dye Canaanite coastal cities were famous for) and were known mainly for their trading.
The Phoenicians got around, perhaps even to America. We owe them our alphabet. They were not known to history for grossly violent evil acts against their neighbors which would go against their trade relationships anyway. The Hebrews gave the Canaanites a bum rap because they wanted the land of Canaan all for themselves.
So for my Canaanite information I read Gray. His information I trust more than others because he taught Semitic Languages in Palestine as well as Scotland, was a minister, and he made a point of not exploiting this sensational Canaanite information as many another would in a bid for fame and fortune. But perhaps that was the times he was writing in- late '50's and '60's.
But even though Gray wrote decades ago this information really is still sensational and every Christian should be aware of pre-Hebrew Canaanite religious beliefs, if for no other reason than to discover the wonderfully mystery of how well the Canaanite conception of EL fits Jesus' "Abba" plus the mystery of why the major Hebrew religious names contain EL in them.
But the beginnings of the Messianic concept can be seen there as well in the concept of the earthly king as a Son of EL who rules the earthly kingdom like EL's rules in heaven, with compassion and wisdom which makes EL's type of kingly rulership radically different from the typical oriental despot/commander-in-chief model God, e.g. YHWH, Marduk, Baal, etc.
If EL has a dark side I haven't found it. That "lurid" story you mention is actually a ribald tale of where EL is made fun of, a Greek-like way of relating a story about this God Most High that humanizes him. Can you imagine Hebrews telling a bawdy story about YHWH? It's the fact that EL was married to Asherah I tell you that makes EL a wiser, kinder God the Father.
But do find a copy of Gray's book. I can't recommend it more highly. There you will find out about the Canaanite and Mesopotamian religious/social concerns for the widow, the orphan, that match Hebrew concerns. Elsewhere I have read of Egyptian concerns for these same lowly classes.
The Hebrews may have broadened the categories for social aid but they didn't invent the morality of altruism. Any society that is going to last has to develop a strong social concern for most if not all members of that society. Actually, in terms of care for the weakest members of society, I have read that the Kalahari Bushpeople surpass all of us in civilized society.
Let us not forget it was the Greeks and not the Hebrews who gave us the Hippocratic Oath as well as the beginnings of democratic idealism. So when you read the Hebrew version of Canaanite morality bear in mind the prejudice. Just like the prejudice of the aggressor European nations used here in America against the native peoples who were "savages" meaning they killed relatively few people with primitive weapons in periodic village raids while Europeans were "civilized" white people, meaning they killed in huge numbers with advanced weapons for territorial conquest and profit.
The Hebrews wanted the Canaanite's land because it was more fertile than the interior desert. Canaan was like California. Coastal sea, forested mountains, fertile valley plains. Not all gravel and sand desert with hardly any vegetation. The Hebrews wanted Canaan but wanted to rule it as Israel from Jerusalem, not the northerly or westerly Canaanite cities. f or for and the earthly kingship. This is where you will find out about how the Canaanite religion and Mesopotamian ones too, had concerns for the widow, the orphan, the bottom wrung members of society that mirror Hebrew concerns.
Please remember I am not a scholar but a visionary servant of God. My scholarship is laughable. Whatever research I do is inspired by visions or religious insights. I am filled with zeal to find out about a certain thing that has curiosity, e.g. why was the Hebrews' Messianic prophesy name contain EL as the name of God instead of one referring to YHWH? So I rush to read what I can get hold of here in my fairly boondocks of a community. So my research is not exhaustive by any means.
I leave it to God for whatever findings I have discovered about God in ancient writings to pass or fail the test of further historical discovery. So far, God's been right on the button about the conclusions I drew early on about using the Bible as a historical reference for ancient Near Eastern religions and cultures.
If you were familiar with the old Gnostic views of YHWH you would know they had about as much use for YHWH as Biomystical Christianity does. In fact, they were so upset with YHWH that they held all of Creation against him, claiming it was a flawed business by an incompetent lower deity who mistakenly thought he was the only god. They thought Creation, the material world was this god's trap for ensnaring souls that desired only to be rejoined with the Light of God.
These early Gnostics had no idea of Canaanite history then and no knowledge that the Canaanite God Most High, EL was a different God than the Hebrew's YHWH because by the time of Christ, the Jews had successfully stripped "EL" of his Canaanite identity to make the word a generic term for "God". But once found, the appellations attributed to EL, the way the Canaanites related to EL, one just has the sense that these people were relating to a Father god whose mildness and non-judgment seems at a far remove from the jealous and vengeful God of Moses.
* *
These "Father" faces of God, EL or YHWH, are just that, "faces" of God seen by humans. Human beings seem incapable of relating to God other than in human being terms which in turn anthropomorphisizes God. In my religious experiences of God, I never hear a voice of God, never meet an angel in the flesh or in dreams or in way experience God as any kind of Being in our human conception of that term.
The closest to establishing an "identity" for the God who meets with me through these synchronicity experiences, is when the name of "Ariel" pops up unexpectedly in synchronistic fashion, e.g. I am visiting my sister in Portland and while I am there somebody is spraying the name "Ariel" around downtown Portland, or like when I went sightseeing up the mountain road to Mt. St. Helens because the eruption of this mountain came months after my religious experience and I thought it might be a sign for further major showings of God's Plan. (the sun was darkened and the moon did turn red in the path of ash from St. Helens). So no big sign from God relating to Mt. St. Helens and me except I run into the little town of Ariel. Stuff like that.
The way God intervenes in my life it makes it hard for me to see any real difference between what I experience as God's guidance in my life and a Path that was already there to begin. Once this Path is found it must be tread because there are no other paths that lead to the ultimate truth of reality which is that reality is all controlled by God, reality is God in the sense that there is no separation possible of material things and events from the hidden or spiritual archetypes or forms of God underlying their existence.
So when I use "EL" for the Father face of God or "Asherah" for the Mother face of God, I do not see these with pagan Canaanite eyes as separate Deities, each with their own separate natures, powers, and areas of sovereignty, but as the primary archetypal aspects of the One God, the Holy One.
The Gnostics were careful to make a distinction between aspects or "emanations" from God and God Itself as a singularity, ultimately inconceivable to the human mind. This keeps Gnosticism monotheistic as opposed to Trinitarian belief. God is always One. When Biomystical Christianity talks of God the Father and the Great Mother it is still in reference to the Holy One as a Unity of these primary opposing aspects of Life that coincide with the primary opposing aspects of Creation, spirit and matter.
If the YHWH Tetragrammaton had kept to symbolizing God as Father-Mother-Son-Daughter it would be easier to keep it as the primary term for God but YHWH is far too associated with Scriptures describing the actions of a very male, tyrant-King type of god, far too harsh in character for the softening Kabbalistic interpretations of the name to overcome.
* *
When I read Gen 3:17 I understand God to be cursing the ground for humankind, cursing humankind to a life of drudgery and toil, and withholding the information about eternal life that Jesus brought. Yes, you are correct in that in those verses God doesn't outright say "eternally" but says "all the days of your life". Since Adam stood as a representative of all humanity "all the days" of Adam's life equal all the days of humanity. If Adam doesn't represent all of humanity then God's commandments and curses apply only to him and perhaps Eve, but not to anyone else.
But Jews and then Christians following Jesus' own self-styling of himself as the "Son of Adam", i.e, as another universal Man like Adam and representing all of humanity, so my reasoning is true, what God did to the first Adam applies to all humanity, at least until Jesus came along and broke the curse of "dust to dust" with knowledge from the Tree of Knowledge about the fruit of the Tree of Life, eternal life, such knowledge the God in Adam and Eve forbids as punishment for his created beings not performing to his desires and that, as I have stated before is not responsible adult parental behavior one should expect from a God touted to be our "Father".
Don't get the idea that just because I am putting this argument out here now that the God in the Adam and Eve story is cruel, not a loving God at all, and also, not omniscient, e.g., "Where are you?" not even knowing where Adam was, that I springing some new Arielite doctrine on you. This view of Yahweh was quite common in Gnostic Christian texts and even one very prominent early Christian theologian who nearly became Bishop of Rome, Marcion, held the exact same viewpoint.
He taught that with Jesus' teachings from his "good Father", the true God had surely shown the world that It had broken with the Judaic line with its limited understanding of God as an often savage and cruel tyrant, Yahweh. To Marcion, only those Christian writings that were free of contamination of the teachings of old Jewish God were valid. So don't think for a moment that because I reject the Old Testament God as the highest spiritual authority, that I reject the true God, the God Jesus worshipped.
I know that God. That God is EL and you can discover for yourselves the difference between EL and Yahweh by going beyond the Jewish prejudice in favor of their tribal God, Yahweh, e.g., saying only that "EL" is merely another name of God, to researching EL's roots in the Promised Land, ancient Canaan. There you will find Jesus' Good Father and the Creator. There you find EL the Compassionate One, EL the Merciful One, EL the Kindly One, EL the Creator, these are the epithets of EL that the Canaanites gave to their God Most High.
The Messiah represents EL as Isaiah shows in the name to be given the Messianic Child, "Immanuel", literally "the God EL is with us". I don't acknowledge God as Yahweh but I do acknowledge that God has worked through the "Yahweh" face shown to the world through the Hebrews. But since Jesus' time the prophesy of the necessity of Elijah coming first has been fulfilled. "Elijah", literally "EL is Jah", EL is Yahweh, the new Good Father face of God to the Jews and to all of us. Instead of being christened Immanuel, Jesus bore Yahweh's name but still He clearly taught EL's compassion and mercy. Therefore, through Jesus, we know EL has become the prominent face of God the Father.
The full Godhead is ELohim and is deliberately a plural noun but represents a single Holy One. I once was willing to toss Yahweh out altogether but God changed my mind. There was a spiritual reason why the face of God to humanity had to go through Yahweh. In ancient times, while EL was Canaan's God Most High and had all the characteristics of Jesus' Good Father and none of Yahweh's tyranny, EL was still just the highest one in a pantheon of deities, each with their own "turf" and ways of acting, i.e, EL was part of true polytheism where there was no concept of a God of All, a single Holy One, incorporating everything in the Universe in Itself.
So to bring that spiritual understanding to humankind God had to establish the concept of monotheism, recognition of a single God of All somewhere which It did first through the Egyptian Pharaoh, Aknaton, then through the Hebrews, when Aknaton blew it by seeing the single God symbolized by the sun, RA, which obviously leaves out the earth, the moon, humanity and Life--not a good symbol for a God of All. But the Yahweh face of the single God of All was deficient from the start as the Yahweh version of the Genesis of humankind, the Adam and Eve story shows all who have not let their faith blind them to truth. The ELohim version, is the one I take as truth in symbolic spiritual form.
ELohim is my God whom I love and obey and who guides me with Its Spirit of Christ. You can keep yourself in spiritual bondage to the Old Testament God but Jesus showed you the truth, and I show you the truth. Later on, when you're more spiritually mature, the Spirit of Christ will show you the Feminine face of ELohim, the Holy One, because God has a Father and a Mother face just as we are made in Its Image, male and female.
* *
God does not change but human understanding of It does. That's why the God Jesus worshipped and whose will he followed and told us to follow can no longer be Yahweh, the tribal god of the Jews. Yahweh was the Hebrew understanding of God as God the Father only. Yahweh was God's darker side from the beginning. Yahweh from the beginning was a savage face of God, a tribal god only really interested in making sure the Jews would follow his Laws by threat of calamity and/or unending punishment.
The moment Yahweh held his created beings eternally responsible for not obeying him and finding out the Truth for themselves is the moment Yahweh reveals his warped character. No responsible human parent would hold their innocent children responsible for lack of knowledge but Yahweh did just that. The moment God told Abraham to kill his son for him, Yahweh again showed his true dark side character. No loving parent would ever demand such obedience that demands destruction of a loving relationship, father to son, in order to appease a tyrant god.
All the Goodness of God is from EL. All the unmerciful judgment, all the lies given to the Hebrews as truths, e.g., follow the Commandment not to murder yet then in the Mosaic Law codes demands murder and orders murder, even genocide of men, women and children as can be seen in the story of Joshua. No god of Justice as is claimed for Yahweh would ever call justice the stealing of another people's land yet Yahweh did just that when the Hebrews invaded Canaan, genocided the people, stole their land, stole the name of their God Most High even, such acts again reversing the Ten Commandments not to covet anything of thy neighbor's.
The true Creator reached Jesus as the Spirit of EL as prophesy demanded because the Creator wanted us to know who the real God the Father was, who Jesus' good Father was. The Goodness of God is through the Spirit of EL which is why the name of EL figures so prominently in Hebrew scriptures even though to them Yahweh is their tribal god. The prophesy of the Messiah included the prophesy of the return of the Spirit of EL back into Hebrew consciousness thus the prophesied Messianic name of "Immanuel", literally "EL is with us". Jesus was the Holy One's way of showing the Jews and then the whole world, the Gentiles, that Yahweh was to be dethroned as the God the Father face of Itself. The Holy One through Jesus (named after Yahweh) sacrificed Yahweh so that the Spirit of EL could be resurrected and reborn into first Jewish then Gentile spiritual understanding of the true Godhead.
But until you search, until you find out who EL really was before the Hebrew's came into EL's homeland and stole EL's name to add to the names of their tribal god, Yahweh, you will never discover who Jesus' Good Father is. You won't discover EL the Compassionate One, EL the Merciful One, EL the Kindly One, all these being the character defining names that the Canaanites understood their God Most High.
Comment